Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] rrdtool pinned to v1.2 on internal

2013-11-09 Thread Bob Proulx
> I needed it for Cacti at a point, because there were issues with newer > rrdtool and current Cacti (despite using Debian stable packages). > > I think the Cacti instance was removed, so the pinning can go away as > well :) Plus Cacti fixed this issue a while ago. Okay. I will go ahead and und

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Pending list

2013-11-09 Thread Karl Berry
There are submissions in the pending list that are in progress or waiting for a reply for one or two years. Why not delete them? If the OP has failed to reply to us for >1 year (or >1 month, for that matter), by all means, delete. If there are cases where the original savannah evaluator

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] gnu.org portions

2013-11-09 Thread Ineiev
On 11/10/2013 12:42 AM, Joan Lledó wrote: You think so? I've seen other projects that are hosted in Savannah that are typed as "www.gnu.org portions" and they seem to be just webpages or translations, e.g. https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/bravegw. bravegw also includes original (English) pages

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] gnu.org portions

2013-11-09 Thread Joan Lledó
You think so? I've seen other projects that are hosted in Savannah that are typed as "www.gnu.org portions" and they seem to be just webpages or translations, e.g. https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/bravegw. The content of the package of this submission seems to be the same, a set of translatio

[Savannah-hackers-public] Pending list

2013-11-09 Thread Joan Lledó
Hi, There are submissions in the pending list that are in progress or waiting for a reply for one or two years. Why not delete them?

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] rrdtool pinned to v1.2 on internal

2013-11-09 Thread Sylvain
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 07:47:54PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Savannah Hackers, > > The rrdtool on VM internal is pinned at version 1.2. Does anyone have > information on why? Lenny 5 had rrdtool 1.3.1. Squeeze has 1.4.3. > So this is pinning the system to quite an old version. > > I am using