Hi Michael,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Michael J. Flickinger mjfl...@gnu.org wrote:
I'm going to have to agree here. I think any policy change should be made
by consensus via email discussion in a public mailing list, such as
savannah-hackers-public. This way we allow for public
Hi again,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 9:43 AM, LynX _l...@bk.ru wrote:
Thank you all for your responses. Why I turned to savannah its because:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-en/ElispArea#toc5
Yes, it's a good place to host software.
But after Mario Castelan Castro I am not sure where I can host
it's the FSF (i.e. Karl Berry)
Just for clarification, I'm a GNU volunteer (just like everyone else
here), not an FSF employee, and in any case Savannah has always had
great independence of decisions. Nor am I the final arbiter of anything :).
But after Mario Castelan Castro I am not
Alex Fernandez wrote:
Improving Emacs on Windows may look like improving Windows, when seen
by a critical eye; but in the end it is more about improving Emacs
itself.
There is little reason to improve Emacs if that improvement is not
going to take us closer where we want to go. The GNU
Karl Berry wrote:
As I say above, it's not up to me to make final decisions -- I think we
should try to reach a consensus. (Before changing guidelines, we should
at least hear from Michael and Jim, who have done much more than me with
savannah internals.) My personal view at the moment is that
Hello,
Thank you all for your responses. Why I turned to savannah its because:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-en/ElispArea#toc5
But after Mario Castelan Castro I am not sure where I can host these
extensions :) Will put them to my homepage :)
Thank you,
LX
26.02.2011 3:55, Mario Castelan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-02-25 in savannah-hackers-pub...@gnu.org,
savannah-register-public@gnu.org thread project approval.
Hello.
Thanks for asking before submitting the project. And thanks to Alex and
Karl too.
Alex Fernandez alejandro...@gmail.com writes:
Hi
