[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2016-04-11 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #25, task #13205 (project administration): OK, thanks for your time. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mensaje enviado vía/por Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2016-04-07 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Update of task #13205 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Percent Complete: 0% => 100% Open/Closed:Open => Closed __

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2015-03-03 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #23, task #13205 (project administration): Hi Pawel, Well, the contest for finding a GPL-licensed theme was a complete failure (I'm probably responsible for), so no great news on this side. OTOH, I've found a GPL-licensed theme on the net¹, but has it own set of problems and ca

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2015-02-17 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #22, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! Are there any news? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Sav

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-10-24 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #21, task #13205 (project administration): Hi Pavel! Well, some progress has been made, but we don't expect icon licensing issues to be resolved until December, when the contest to get a properly licensed theme ends. You and the rest of savannah comunity are invited to particip

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-10-17 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #20, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! Two months later: any progress? Any ideas on when we can expect the issues to be resolved? Thank you! ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-08-12 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #19, task #13205 (project administration): Of course, it's possible; please let us know when you resolve those issues. ___ Reply to this item at: __

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-08-12 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #18, task #13205 (project administration): > Hello, Ricardo! > > Are you still interested in registering this package on Savannah? Sure, if it's still possible. Anyway some time is needed to solve the default icon set issue.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-08-12 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #17, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! Are you still interested in registering this package on Savannah? ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-07-03 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #16, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! > Indeed, it's just a suggestion because in practice is not the length of the file what matters No, what matters is copyrightability, and its standards are pretty low, universally. TTBOMK monostichs are copyrightable.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Karl Berry
Follow-up Comment #15, task #13205 (project administration): Re XPMs - you are not the first project to have icons or other small images of unknown, but almost certainly ok, provenance. Of course it would be good to replace them, but I don't see it as grounds for rejection. Regarding the "shorte

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #14, task #13205 (project administration): > Programs come and go. I recall bochs image files of earlier > distros that became technically illegal because it's practically > impossible to get their corresponding source code. Yeah, but since traveling to past to dismantle the in

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #13, task #13205 (project administration): > GNU documentation suggests 15 lines long files are nontrivial [0], > so most Makefile.ams are, and certainly src/Makefile.am. > [0] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html Indeed, it's just a suggestion

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #11, task #13205 (project administration): > If you read it closely it says 'nontrivial' source file. These already > have the text recommended by GPL. GNU documentation suggests 15 lines long files are nontrivial [0], so most Makefile.ams are, and certainly src/Makefile.am. [0

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #12, task #13205 (project administration): > So, author of Foobar copied a Makefile.am from last copy of Claws > Mail available in the Universe and then shredded it! Programs come and go. I recall bochs image files of earlier distros that became technically illegal because it's

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #10, task #13205 (project administration): Hi Pavel, > Hello, Ricardo! > > AFAIK default GPL usage is always 'or later' unless specifically > > removed, > > The GPL says > > Now, "or any later version" is obviously not present in > > The GPL version is implicitly defined

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #9, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! > AFAIK default GPL usage is always 'or later' unless specifically removed, The GPL says If the Program specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General Public License “or any later version” applies to it,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-25 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #8, task #13205 (project administration): > > It's just a pointer, like own's GPL usage, though less verbose, > > of course, and much more direct. The pointed file contains all > > the information, including copyright and license version. > For the reference: I looked at > ht

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-24 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #7, task #13205 (project administration): > Well, given VCS history I don't think we can set an appropriate copyright... Anyway we're already looking for a solution for this... Thank you! > It's just a pointer, like own's GPL usage, though less verbose, of course, and much more

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-24 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #6, task #13205 (project administration): > I've cloned the repository; as far as I can see, > the issue with the images hasn't been resolved (including the XMPs); Well, given VCS history I don't think we can set an appropriate copyright or even authorship without an unbearabl

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-06 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #5, task #13205 (project administration): You are right, LGPL2.1 is compatible with GPL2+. If MPL 1.0 is not accepted as plugin license, then the plugin in question is LGPL2.1. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-06 Thread Colin Leroy
Follow-up Comment #4, task #13205 (project administration): Hi, > Besides that, it seems to me that "LGPL2.1-only or MPL 1.0" > plugins might raise a compatibility issue. Gnu.org seems to tell us LGPL2.1 only is compatible with GPL3+ in the compatibility matrix : https://www.gnu.org/licenses/g

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-06-05 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #3, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! I've cloned the repository; as far as I can see, the issue with the images hasn't been resolved (including the XMPs); also, some source files lack licensing and copyright notices, e.g. plugins/notification/gtkhotkey/gtk-h

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-05-29 Thread Ricardo Mones
Follow-up Comment #2, task #13205 (project administration): Hi Pavel, Sorry for the late response but we have been busy with preparing a new release¹ where hopefully most of your concerns have been fixed. Some other which didn't get in time for release has already been fixed in git². Not sure if

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-05-17 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Update of task #13205 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-05-17 Thread Pavel Kharitonov
Follow-up Comment #1, task #13205 (project administration): Hello, Ricardo! Thank you for your submission! I see just a couple of issues with your tarball. NEWS, po/ja.po, po/en_GB.po (and many other source files in po/), m4/aspell.m4 [*], m4/spamassassin.m4, m4/check-type.m4, m4/Makefile.am (a

[Savannah-register-public] [task #13205] Submission of Claws Mail

2014-05-15 Thread Ricardo Mones
URL: Summary: Submission of Claws Mail Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: mones Submitted on: jue 15 may 2014 10:36:15 GMT Should Start On: jue 15 may 2014 00:00:00 GMT Should