be part of
it anyway.
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:56:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SC-L] Origins of Security Problems
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Secured by aspStation
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prec
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Secured by aspStation
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Mailing-List: contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; run by MajorDomo
List-Id: Secu
Mark Rockman wrote:
I had no idea I was promulgating a syllogism. In fact, I did not intend to.
My point was that the world changed and the software didn't nor did people
change their behaviors to compensate.
The threat-level changed when people hooked computers running critical
applications to th
At 9:52 AM -0700 6/17/04, Blue Boar wrote:
>ljknews wrote:
>> A significant difference from DECnet is that with TCP/IP any user on the
>> system can open up a channel (to use a neutral term) to receive incoming
>> traffic, potentially providing a capability to the outside world without
>> the least
