That page is a link to the doc types html: http://www.webappsec.org/projects/waf_evaluation/v1/wafec-draft-1-20051007.html
txt http://www.webappsec.org/projects/waf_evaluation/v1/wafec-draft-1-20051007.txt pdf http://www.webappsec.org/projects/waf_evaluation/v1/wafec-draft-1-20051007.pdf -gp Quoting ljknews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 11:39 PM -0400 10/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The Web Application Firewall Evaluation Criteria project is proud > > to announce its first public release. > > > > The goal of the project is to develop a detailed web application > > firewall evaluation criteria; a testing methodology that can be > > used by any reasonably skilled technician to independently assess > > quality of a web application firewall. > > > > The primary purpose of this release is to solicit comments from the > > public. You can download the current version of the evaluation > > criteria from the project home page: > > > > http://www.webappsec.org/projects/waf_evaluation/ > > Hmmm. That page shows me a blank page with a lovely logo and toolbar > at the top. Other pages on that site do not have that problem. > > Then again, http://validator.w3.org says that page has 167 errors on it. > > I would say that conforming to standards should be the first step, > especially when an automatic checker is available. > -- > Larry Kilgallen > > >
