Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should ca re

2006-05-24 Thread leichter_jerrold
| Stephen de Vries wrote: | > Hi Dinis, | > | > I think you're overestimating the effectiveness of a sandbox in preventing | > common web app vulnerabilities, and you're instead focussing on the tiny | > fraction of specific attacks that can be stopped with sandboxes. | Well Stephen, I would argue

Re: [SC-L] Ajax one panel

2006-05-24 Thread Crispin Cowan
Gary McGraw wrote: > Btw, bill also said they tried twice to build an OS on java and failed both > times. We both agree that a type safe OS will happen one day. > Did he ever articulate what happened to these OS's? I recall a presentation at OSDI 1996 by a Sun executive talking about JavaOS an

Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care

2006-05-24 Thread Andrew van der Stock
Dinis, Sandboxing prevents a machine from having bad system() and buffer overflows causing system compromise. Sure that's bad enough. However, sandboxing does not prevent: * all types of cross-site scripting * SQL injection * Command injection via SQL injection (xp_cmdshell and similar Orac