On 11/7/06, Wall, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Developers have to cut corners somewhere, and since security issues
> are not paramount, that's often what gets overlooked.
>
this is the biggest issue i think. it gets overlooked because
management dont value it. partly because its expensive
At 10:47 AM -0500 11/6/06, der Mouse wrote:
>> I read this thread and I little be afraid. I'm just ahead of a
>> complete rewriting of my program. The previous code was written in
>> pure C (with an OOP looks-like somewhere).
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something. Why do you have to abandon C? You
In response to a post by Jerry Leichter, Gadi Evron wrote...
> A bridge is a single-purpose device. A watch is a simple
> purpose computer, as was the Enigma machine, if we can call
> it such.
>
> Multi-purpose computers or programmable computers are where
> our problems start. Anyone can DO and
> I read this thread and I little be afraid. I'm just ahead of a
> complete rewriting of my program. The previous code was written in
> pure C (with an OOP looks-like somewhere).
Perhaps I'm missing something. Why do you have to abandon C? You
mention C++, C#, and Java, but no other languages;
| Most of the incidents in your first paragraph were improved with the
| establishment of laws, regulation bodies, and external testing with a
| stamp of approval. The Underwriters labaroratory was established to
| ensure that a product was sales worthy to the public due to
| manufacturers focusin
On 11/6/06, SZALAY Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I read this thread and I little be afraid. I'm just ahead of a complete
> rewriting of my program. The previous code was written in pure C (with
> an OOP looks-like somewhere).
>
> This program should run on Linux, freebsd and windo
for cross-platform C# there is the mono project which do a great jpb of porting the .NET framework to the Linux world, check it out at : http://www.mono-project.com/further perl or python (which are more or less cross-platform) might also be used for your rewrite project, all depends one your speci
Most of the incidents in your first paragraph were improved with the establishment of laws, regulation bodies, and external testing with a stamp of approval. The Underwriters labaroratory was established to ensure that a product was sales worthy to the public due to manufacturers focusing on sales
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
> Much as I agree with many of the sentiments expressed in this discussion,
> there's a certain air of unreality to it. While software has it's own
> set of problems, it's not the first engineered artifact with security
> implications in the history of th
Hi All!
I read this thread and I little be afraid. I'm just ahead of a complete
rewriting of my program. The previous code was written in pure C (with
an OOP looks-like somewhere).
This program should run on Linux, freebsd and windows platform. This
program is a GUI, so it has a graphical interfa
On 11/5/06, David Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mikeiscool wrote:
>
> >>
> Don't go there, sister. Come up with some reasonable tests before making a
> statement like that. "Assembly code can be as much as a million times faster
> then the run time of a C++ version of the same algorithm." Bi
11 matches
Mail list logo
