All,
The question of "Is my answer going to be high-enough resolution to support
manual review?" or "...to support a developer fixing the problem?" comes down
to "it depends". And, as we all know, I simply can't resist an "it depends"
kind of subtlety.
Yes, Jim, if you're doing a pure JavaSE
Sometimes integration is a good and bad thing. I hope that my Ounce
enhancement request for integration with HP Quality Center and Archer
GRC doesn't get deprioritized over rebranding efforts.
Likewise, this also has the potential of causing many more IBM employees
than current to pay attention to
This is something where I have to watch my own mind. Figuring out a
binary in C++ is very difficult. The Java is not really a binary, at
least not in the "runs by itself" meaning. (Everything is (a) binary
in reality, including the file holding this email.)
Realizing that java "binarie
hi sc-l,
Christian Collberg (an important pioneer in software protection) just published
a great book called "Surreptitious Software". It's just plain good.
http://www.amazon.com/Surreptitious-Software-Watermarking-Tamperproofing-Addison-Wesley/dp/0321549252
I blogged about the book on Justice
On Jul 29, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Brad Andrews wrote:
Realizing that java "binaries" hold a lot more is a mental shift
that probably must be actively kept in mind. Those with only Java
experience may think it is obvious, but how many developers did not
start with Java and have not purged this co
