RE: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care

2006-05-27 Thread Jeff Williams
Dinis Cruz wrote: If you do accept that it is possible to build such sandboxes, then we need to move to the next interesting discussion, which is the 'HOW' Namely, HOW can an environment be created where the development and deployment of such Sandboxes makes business sense. It's the

Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care

2006-05-27 Thread George Capehart
Dinis Cruz wrote: snip After my explanations in this email do you still think that this is correct? Or can you accept now that it is possible to build a Sandboxed environment that is able to protect against the majority of the serious security issues that affect web apps today? If you do

Re: [SC-L] Re: [WEB SECURITY] On sandboxes, and why you should care

2006-05-24 Thread Andrew van der Stock
Dinis, Sandboxing prevents a machine from having bad system() and buffer overflows causing system compromise. Sure that's bad enough. However, sandboxing does not prevent: * all types of cross-site scripting * SQL injection * Command injection via SQL injection (xp_cmdshell and similar