Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-29 Thread Rohit Lists
Most of the SANS classes are network/infrastructure related, but some of them are made specifically for secure coding in a particular language. I'm an instructor and courseware developer for Security 541, the secure coding in Java / JEE class (http://www.sans.org/ns2008/description.php?tid=1937).

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-29 Thread Robert Martin
As a compliment to coding standards you may want to consider using the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) as a target list of coding, design and implementation issues you are trying to minimize through use of those coding standards. Using the CWEs can also help you to drive and correlate your te

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-29 Thread Robert C. Seacord
An0n S3c, i see you have already found our site, but i should probably take this opportunity to provide a couple of updates. first of all, CERT has released the Java Secure Coding Standard in addition to existing secure coding standards for the C and C++ programming languages. CERT invites the Ja

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-29 Thread anon sec
Jim Thanks. I will add that to the list. An0n S3c On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Jim Manico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew van der Stock is also approaching this issue from a high level at > > http://www.greebo.net/2008/09/24/coding-standard/ > > His list looks rather complete. > > - Jim >

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-29 Thread Cassidy, Colin (GE Infra, Energy)
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of anon sec Sent: 27 September 2008 20:58 To: sc-l@securecoding.org Subject: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards I am looking for a comprehensive set of secure coding standards to implement into my dev organization. These standar

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-28 Thread Jim Manico
Andrew van der Stock is also approaching this issue from a high level at http://www.greebo.net/2008/09/24/coding-standard/ His list looks rather complete. - Jim > My thoughts... > > You standards really need more context - the standards for Java thick > client vs Java server/web code would be r

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-28 Thread Jim Manico
My thoughts... You standards really need more context - the standards for Java thick client vs Java server/web code would be rather different, for example. Make sure your guide gives recomendations specific to the context of the application type. On that note, other thoughts * Robert Seacord

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-28 Thread anon sec
Category:Countermeasure (sporadic) > > cheers, > Bedirhan Urgun > http://www.webguvenligi.org > http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Turkey > > > -- > > Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:57:40 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: sc-l@secur

Re: [SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-28 Thread Bedirhan Urgun
d yet but seems rather comprehensive) http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Countermeasure (sporadic) cheers,Bedirhan Urgunhttp://www.webguvenligi.orghttp://www.owasp.org/index.php/Turkey Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:57:40 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [SC-L] Secure Coding

[SC-L] Secure Coding Standards

2008-09-28 Thread anon sec
I am looking for a comprehensive set of secure coding standards to implement into my dev organization. These standards should cover Java, Web, and C/C++ as well as guidelines for using features like encryption, authentication, SSO, SSL, etc. I am open to both publicly available standards as well as