On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:10:22PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>
> That's why I pictured IT plus other corporate authorities. When you
> compromise security on a company's network you give away the keys to
> the corporate kingdom. That can, has, and should lead to a firing.
>
> Having a password that
On 2017-03-31 18:09, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
anybody who did [this] [should] be fired upon it's discovery, not "let go" or
"laid off" but really "fired for cause".
I am not sure I like this crazy talk about IT departements becoming judge, jury
and executioner and about firing people left
>
> anybody who did [this] [should] be fired upon it's discovery, not "let go" or
> "laid off" but really "fired for cause".
>
I am not sure I like this crazy talk about IT departements becoming judge, jury
and executioner and about firing people left and right for violating some
arbitrarily made
On 2017-03-31 15:29, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 31/03/17 23:04, jdow wrote:
On 2017-03-31 13:44, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 31/03/17 13:40, James M. Pulver wrote:
Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support isn't
providing the resources you need to run the experiment?
I have been running KDE on my SL6 linux desktop for several years with
no problems. I started with SL6.3 and it is now at 6.8.
I've just done a number of upgrades of SL5 machines. You can choose to
install KDE when you select the desktop environment.
(All my machines are 64-bit.)
Cheers,
Eve
On 2017-03-31 13:44, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 31/03/17 13:40, James M. Pulver wrote:
Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support isn't
providing the resources you need to run the experiment?
This is absolutely important to consider for the person going to do such
a
On 31/03/17 13:40, James M. Pulver wrote:
> Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support isn't
> providing the resources you need to run the experiment?
This is absolutely important to consider for the person going to do such
a project. But that shouldn't stop us on this ML
On 31/03/17 20:06, Larry Linder wrote:
We are still using SL 5.10 on a number of workstations. The users are
used to using KDE with a lot of desktops - 12 or more. We switched a
number of boxes to SL 6.8 and we get a lot of grumbles about desktop.
We run VMWare and load applications that
Thank you!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 03:01:30PM -0400, James M. Pulver wrote:
>
> This is true, but in this case I wonder if the person is drowning
> because they followed their GPS (google) off a cliff into the ocean, ...
>
most likely.
>
> I just have to wonder, what sort of experiment needs to be
>
We are still using SL 5.10 on a number of workstations. The users are
used to using KDE with a lot of desktops - 12 or more. We switched a
number of boxes to SL 6.8 and we get a lot of grumbles about desktop.
We run VMWare and load applications that require Windows there. We have
everything
Time for a loud and clear "THANK YOU!" to the (present and former) team members
for a full decade of remarkable support for SL5.
- Stephan
On Mar 31, 2017, at 20:27 , Pat Riehecky wrote:
> Scientific Linux 5 has reached its End of Life.
>
> After March 31 2017 Scientific Linux 5 will not
On 03/31/2017 01:53 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:40:15AM -0400, James M. Pulver wrote:
Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support
isn't providing the resources you need to run the experiment?
Cue-in the usual "expectation vs reality"
The reality is, if you don't involve someone from IT, you have a very
high likelihood of causing problems for both yourself and others. IT
can't necessarily do all the work here, but they should definitely be
involved in the discussion. If nothing else, they should be helping
decide which
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:40:15AM -0400, James M. Pulver wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support
> isn't providing the resources you need to run the experiment?
>
Cue-in the usual "expectation vs reality" meme.
The reality of IT support is you open a
Hi James, and others,
On 03/31/2017 07:40 AM, James M. Pulver wrote:
> Shouldn't we all take a step back here and ask why your IT support
> isn't providing the resources you need to run the experiment? I
> certainly would not want a user to set up an ad-hoc linux router that
> they didn't
16 matches
Mail list logo
