A URL, no. I'm happy to answer any questions on the experience. It's Centos 8 and as I said, I've been avoiding systemd based systems like the plague... And it is a plague in my
opinion.
I did find a package that "auto-installed" for the server install called
performance co-pilot that
-- Forwarded message -
From: Yasha Karant
Date: Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: FWIW: AlmaLinux now available.
To: scientific-linux-users
I have not downloaded (and thus not installed) AL8. From below:
> My recollection of a fresh install of SL (it has been a number
On 4/3/21 4:43 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
I have not downloaded (and thus not installed) AL8. From below:
with
> unfortunate issues precisely replicing [replicating?] those of RHEL
installation
> media, such as an absurd number of confusingly distinct software
> channels, and no default mirror
Would you be willing to post or provide a URL in which you cover in a
bit more detail your experience with the actual installation and any
issues that arose during the installation (including disk layout, file
systems used, etc)?
On 4/3/21 7:18 PM, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
On 4/3/21 4:43 PM,
I have not downloaded (and thus not installed) AL8. From below:
with
> unfortunate issues precisely replicing [replicating?] those of RHEL
installation
> media, such as an absurd number of confusingly distinct software
> channels, and no default mirror list on the network bootable media.
>
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:52 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:39:17AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> > AlmaLinux stable release is now available.
> >
>
> Question is: but for how long? until red hat pulls a centos on them?
>
> P.S.
>
> My message is "FU!D". Fear,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:39:17AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> AlmaLinux stable release is now available.
>
Question is: but for how long? until red hat pulls a centos on them?
P.S.
My message is "FU!D". Fear, check! Uncertainty, check! Deception? Nope, happened
before, will happen again.
From:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__almalinux.org_=DwID-g=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A=KU_K6Bb6uJskkQm0ARvjm17xkYDdWaB3_FkejuJOG48=0dJ5TofplnmjW7jomirkBqLAnePLrd6g4rgnOAamFZw=
As a standalone, completely free
Thank you for the info. Almalinux is a candidate for me. Please continue to
post your impressions, pros and cons. Thank you.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Lamar Owen
Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 10:39 AM
To:
On 4/3/21 11:39 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
In the For What It's Worth department:
Also in the FWIW department, I put direct links in my message; the URL
Proof Point links are how the list software here changes the typed links
for safety, but makes them nearly unreadable.
Direct link to
In the For What It's Worth department:
AlmaLinux stable release is now available. I've used the
almalinux-deploy shell script (see
11 matches
Mail list logo
