Keith Lofstrom writes:
> I very much hope to stay connected to the "scientific"
> aspect of our community. Making big changes together
> with other science computationalists would be easier.
I note that Debian has a science group which, unlike "Scientific" Linux,
actually provides packaging of
Hi,
~Stack~ writes:
> I'm curious about your thoughts on what it means to have that
> sustainable footing going forward.
A little bit pontificating but here is my take: "sustainable computing"
must be "community all the way down". We must reject attempts by
flighty (or other) corporations to
This is not a political reply.
Keith Lofstrom writes:
> The big physics labs that supported Scientific Linux get
> much or all of their funding from the US government,
CERN is primarily funded by CERN nation states, of which US is not one.
FNAL, being a US DOE National Lab, is primarily
Just a couple thoughts on framing this "development":
Yasha Karant writes:
> Translation -- as a for-profit vendor, IBM does not want to subsidize
> a competitor to RHEL that is without fee.
I see this move in even worse light. Previously there was mutual
benefit and trust between RH and
Nico Kadel-Garcia writes:
> And oh, my, if you want to discard systemd, you'll need to go to an OS
> based on an entirely distinct kernel, say one of the BSD's.
Here are some Linux-based options sans systemd:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Linux_distributions_without_systemd
-Brett.
Yasha Karant writes:
> Thanks for the comments. Is BNL still part of the HEP
> collaborations?
Very much so. Many of ideas that became DUNE originated here. We also
have a major ATLAS contingent, muon g-2 was conceived and first ran at
BNL. BNL has a long history of HEP.
> If so, would
Yasha Karant writes:
> Zoom
Ignoring the recent news items and that the Zoom client for Ubuntu
hasn't been updated in forever and that the whole thing is
proprietary...
...Zoom works fine on Ubuntu 18.04 for me.
You might consider to try out Jitsi Meet. It works rather well in the
tests I've
Hi Konstantin,
Konstantin Olchanski writes:
> This happened right after the first quad-PentiumPro machines became
> available, with Dell dual-PentiumII/III to follow soon after.
Yes and it's why www.phy.bnl.gov is running on a system that still
caries the (internal) hostname "phyppro1"!
> I
"Peter Willis" writes:
> Perhaps, if it’s not too much trouble, people on the list might give a short
> blurb about
> how they use it and why.
SL (and soon changing to Centos) provides a monoculture in HEP computing
so there is no choice for me but to consider it.
I use Debian-based
Yasha Karant writes:
> In the best of all possible worlds, I or my students would have time
> to build applications from source -- but there are too many and not
> enough time, forcing the use of repositories with pre-built RPMs (or
> DEBs if we switch to Ubuntu). Note that we run the same base
Bill Maidment writes:
> If anything does go awry in the future, I do not see major science
> institutions sitting back and doing nothing about it. Maybe even SL
> would then arise again? Call it Phoenix?
My personal guess is that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to
again create a Linux
My understanding is that the excessive encrusting excrescence infecting
fnal.gov lists is from ProofPoint, not MicroSoft.
The tip about controlling MS's "Safe Links" is good. I'm curious how
ProofPoint reacts.
This whole message is PGP-signed via the MIME attachment method. If the
following
A few comments and suggestions:
Look into "Reproducible Research" methods and find ways to help more
crusty scientists adopt them. Emacs Org-mode documents and IPython
Notebooks are two popular ways to write a paper that you can rebuild
when data or analysis is updated.
Your "linear slider"
Yasha Karant writes:
> Is there any licensed-for-free LaTeX WYSIWYG
TeXmacs is GPL'ed
http://www.texmacs.org/
Personally, I use "What I Type Is Very Soon What I See":
emacs file.tex &
atril file.pdf &
latexmk -pvc -pdf file.tex
-Brett.
signature.asc
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Moore writes:
> Have any of you-all considered replacing (student) linux workstations
> with small single-board arm systems (eg a Raspberry Pi2 or TI's
> Beagleboard)? In terms of unit cost and power consumption they seem
> like an attractive solution for
~Stack~ i.am.st...@gmail.com writes:
Because the app acts funny when X forwarded over SSH
What does funny mean?
All that is needed to run remote X11 programs displayed on your local
X11 server's screen is:
local ssh -Y user@remote
remote the-gui-program
If your network connection is
Bill Hn positiv...@gmx.com writes:
My question is : what desktop actually IS good now-a-days ?
this is, of course, very subjective.
I've used Gnome 2 with Sawfish since forever but took a few months to
switch to Gnome 3, first with Gnome Shell and then with Unity. I
learned to appreciate
Mahmood N nt_mahm...@yahoo.com writes:
[root@N100 mahmood]# groups mahmood
mahmood : devs mahmood
[root@N100 mahmood]# groups devs
plotfi : devs
[mahmood@N100 ~]$ ls /home/devs/tools
ls: cannot access /home/devs/tools: Permission denied
Besides Jon's response, keep in mind that recent
Patrick J. LoPresti lopre...@gmail.com writes:
See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds or
https://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/deterministic-builds or
http://www.chromium.org/developers/testing/isolated-testing/deterministic-builds
or just try a search of your own.
To add, if
Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu writes:
How exactly does a for-profit corporation buy an endeavor such as
CentOS?
By hiring the key, primary developers, I would imagine.
Could RH buy SL from Fermilab/CERN?
RH can try (and has succeeded once in the past) to hire SL developers
away.
Hi Chip,
I don't know what is wrong but a couple small directions to try:
Does iptables -L confirm that the firewall rules have been flushed
out?
Can you rule out any potential connection to your socket code by
reproducing the problem with netcat/nc?
On the server:
nc -l -p PORT HOST
On
21 matches
Mail list logo