why not 2.6.32-573.7.1 ?

Hi, why the kernel 2.6.32-573.7.1 had never been released for SL6 ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1827.html It was for Centos 6 also Thanks smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: php 5.5

Hi you can use one of this repositories http://rpms.famillecollet.com/enterprise/7/ or https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/php55/ Le mercredi 23 septembre 2015 à 12:03 +0200, Ralf Farke a écrit : > Hi, > is there a way to get php 5.5 for Scientific Linux 7.1? > > Thanks and greeti

Re: SL6 & firefox 31

Le 30/10/2014 14:03, Akemi Yagi a écrit : On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Matthieu Guionnet wrote: Hi, where can we find the rpm for this security update ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1635.html Thanks. It is in the sl-testing repository. Akemi thanks for this. I tested quickly

SL6 & firefox 31

Hi, where can we find the rpm for this security update ? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1635.html Thanks. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Nautilus respawning to infinity

Le 04/02/2014 04:52, John H. Outlan a écrit : Several of us over at the forum are having a nautilus problem. Nautilus is respawning non stop and filling the window list on bottom panel. Some with update, some with clean 6.5 x64 install. Here's the forum link: http://scientificlinuxforum.org/

Re: What happened to adobe repository ?

evince by default (gnome). okular, the viewer for kde desktop can be use too. both are mush more faster than adobe reader... Le mercredi 15 janvier 2014 à 11:44 +0100, Jean-Michel Barbet a écrit : > On 01/15/2014 11:20 AM, Urs Beyerle wrote: > > > Adobe discontinued the Adobe Reader 9 for Linux

Re: What happened to adobe repository ?

Nothings They just don't want you to see all the files in this directory. yum doesn't need to. It will access to this url http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/repodata/repomd.xml and access directly to the install and update RPM files given in the others urls (primary.xml.gz for example here

Re: Software Collections 1.0 is available for testing for SL 6

thanks for this very good news ! the repository is sl-testing ! does it mean that it'll be later on main repo sl ? Why you don't create a new repo like you've done for devtoolset ? A choice from RedHat ? Will you need some (good) fell-back on a specific mailing-list ? Thanks again Le mardi 24