Re: 348 updates?

2014-11-16 Thread FRANCHISSEUR Robert
-- Le (On) 2014-11-13 +0300 à (at) 00:27:04 Vladimir Mosgalin écrivit (wrote): -- > Hi Pat Riehecky! > > On 2014.11.12 at 14:51:57 -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote next: > > > On 11/12/2014 02:02 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > > > >348 u

Re: 348 updates?

2014-11-12 Thread Vladimir Mosgalin
Hi Pat Riehecky! On 2014.11.12 at 14:51:57 -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote next: > On 11/12/2014 02:02 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >348 updates? Did we, by chance, just go to SL 6.6? > > > >-T > > > > > Did this list not receive a cop

Re: 348 updates?

2014-11-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
-linux-users Subject: 348 updates? Hi All, 348 updates? Did we, by chance, just go to SL 6.6? -T On 11/12/2014 12:12 PM, Steven C Timm wrote: This is what Pat referred to a couple weeks ago of a bunch of SL 6.6 errata that would be available as security updates to the older SL6's.

Re: 348 updates?

2014-11-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] on behalf of ToddAndMargo [toddandma...@zoho.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:02 PM To: scientific-linux-users Subject: 348 updates? Hi All

RE: 348 updates?

2014-11-12 Thread Steven C Timm
v] on behalf of ToddAndMargo [toddandma...@zoho.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:02 PM To: scientific-linux-users Subject: 348 updates? Hi All, 348 updates? Did we, by chance, just go to SL 6.6? -T -- ~~ Computers are like air conditioners.