On 10/15/18 6:39 AM, Larry Linder wrote:
When you look at the /dev/disk and the directories there is no occurance
of "sde"
We tried to modify "fstab" manuall but the device code - decoding scheme
didn't work. System booted to "rescue".
There are a number of problems with the GigaBit MB and one
>
> Unfortunately, in the world I am in we have ...
> jr admins build the box ...
> sr admins ... fix it.
>
I was going to comment on the high labour costs of creating,
managing and resizing all these partitions (vs buying a separate
120GB SSD for each partition, at $70 a pop).
But in the world
On 10/15/2018 05:04 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>> 5. Plextor DVD
> No paper tape reader?
>
LOL.
I backup my irreplaceable data onto M-Disc DVD's - one copy is kept here
with me and two additional copies are kept, one at an East coast
location and the other at a West coast location. This cr
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 04:33:56PM -0400, Larry Linder wrote:
> Disk:
> 1. WD2 TBsdb contains /usr/local & /engr, /engr/users
> 2. WD2 TBsdc contains /mariadb, & company library
> 3. WD2 TBsdd contains /backup for other machines
> 4. WD2 T
When you look at the /dev/disk and the directories there is no occurance
of "sde"
We tried to modify "fstab" manuall but the device code - decoding scheme
didn't work. System booted to "rescue".
There are a number of problems with the GigaBit MB and one has to do
with the serial communication.
On 10/14/2018 09:51 AM, ~Stack~ wrote:
> We do a pool of mirrored disks with fast SSD's for our ZFS caching.
> Performance is fantastic and, as I mentioned in another reply, the
> rebuild time of a failed drive (or a resilvering when I upgraded all of
> the drives on the fly without downtime) is wa
On 10/13/2018 11:22 AM, Adam Jensen wrote:
> On 10/12/2018 11:09 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
>> For all the arguments of performance, well I wouldn't use either XFS or
>> EXT4. I use ZFS and Ceph on the systems I want performance out of.
>
> For a single, modest server that runs everything - email, web, DB
On 10/13/2018 04:41 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:09 PM ~Stack~ wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
>>> ext filesystems, I've known its original author for dec
My one and only question is, do you see the device for sde, in any form
(/dev/sdeX, /dev/disk/by-*, etc) present in /etc/fstab with the proper
mount point(s)?
It really doesn't matter WHAT the device tech is. /etc/fstab just tells
the OS where to put the device into the filesystem... Or it di
On 10/12/2018 11:09 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
> For all the arguments of performance, well I wouldn't use either XFS or
> EXT4. I use ZFS and Ceph on the systems I want performance out of.
For a single, modest server that runs everything - email, web, DBMS,
etc. - I've recently switched from FreeBSD-11.2
The problem is not associated with the file system.
We have a newer system with SL 7.5 and xfs and we have the same problem.
I omited a lot of directories because of time and importance. fstab is
what is mounted and used by OS.
The fstab was copied exactly as SL 7.5 built it. It does not give y
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:09 PM ~Stack~ wrote:
>
> On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> [snip]
> > On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
> > ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
> > my little brother in my fraternity!)
Another issue is that Dropbox have announced that henceforth
they will only support ext4.
On 13/10/18 04:09, ~Stack~ wrote:
> On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> [snip]
>> On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
>> ext filesystems, I've known its origi
On 10/12/18 8:09 PM, ~Stack~ wrote:
On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[snip]
On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
my little brother in my fraternity!) But there's not a compellin
On 10/12/2018 07:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[snip]
> On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
> ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
> my little brother in my fraternity!) But there's not a compelling
> reason to use it in recent SL
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:50 PM Larry Linder
wrote:
>
> New System:
>
> Gigabyte Mother board.
> 32 G Ram
> 6 core AMD processor.
> ext4 FS ??
On SL 7? Why? Is there any reason not to use xfs? I've appreciated the
ext filesystems, I've known its original author for decades. (He was
my little bro
And bios sees it, right?
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 16:50 Larry Linder
wrote:
> New System:
>
> Gigabyte Mother board.
> 32 G Ram
> 6 core AMD processor.
> ext4 FS ??
>
> Disk:
> 0. SSD 240G sda cibtaubs o/s
> 1. WD 2 TBsdb contains /usr/local & /engr, /engr/users
> 2. WD 2 TB
New System:
Gigabyte Mother board.
32 G Ram
6 core AMD processor.
ext4 FS ??
Disk:
0. SSD 240G sda cibtaubs o/s
1. WD 2 TBsdb contains /usr/local & /engr, /engr/users
2. WD 2 TBsdc contains /mariadb, & company library
3. WD 2 TBsdd contains /backup for other
18 matches
Mail list logo
