Re: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 5 November 2015 at 04:52, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one prototype of > our system running it (most of our productions are still running older > openSUSE on ext4). > There are several caveats to that. 1) They only use i

RE: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare)
Benjamin, If you have not already considered it I would encourage you to check out ZFS on Linux. ZFS was the predecessor and inspiration to BTRFS and is now very readily available and stable/supported by the Linux community in general via each specific distro that includes it and the ZOL

RE: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Benjamin Lefoul
...@lists.topphemmelig.net] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 1:53 PM To: Benjamin Lefoul Subject: Re: BTRFS On 05/11/15 12:52, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one > prototype of our system running it (most of our productions are still >

Re: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread David Sommerseth
On 05/11/15 12:52, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one > prototype of our system running it (most of our productions are still > running older openSUSE on ext4). > > We are considering switching to Scientific Linux, but the b

Re: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one prototype of > our system running it (most of our productions are still running older > openSUSE on ext4). > > We are considering switching to Scientific

RE: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Benjamin Lefoul
Thanks. OpenSUSE 13.2 uses btrfs as default (!!) and we have one prototype of our system running it (most of our productions are still running older openSUSE on ext4). We are considering switching to Scientific Linux, but the btrfs question remains. The prototype is doing fine so far, but what

Re: BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread David Sommerseth
On 05/11/15 09:38, Benjamin Lefoul wrote: > Hi, > > If the btrfs filesystem on SL7 mature enough for a production environment? > According to Sanders van Vugt it was not even available in RHEL 7.0, but will > be (is?) in updates… I would claim that btrfs is NOT ready for prime

BTRFS

2015-11-05 Thread Benjamin Lefoul
Hi, If the btrfs filesystem on SL7 mature enough for a production environment? According to Sanders van Vugt it was not even available in RHEL 7.0, but will be (is?) in updates… Regards, Benjamin Lefoul nWISE AB