On 11/09/2017 09:08 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 11/08/2017 06:25 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 11/07/2017 06:22 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, ToddAndMargo
wrote:
And you know the Cxxx series of chipsets have been around
for a while now. Just not long enough to be o
On 11/08/2017 06:25 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 11/07/2017 06:22 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, ToddAndMargo
wrote:
And you know the Cxxx series of chipsets have been around
for a while now. Just not long enough to be out of
production at which point it will app
On 11/07/2017 06:22 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 11/07/2017 04:59 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
"Continual Improvement" also means "continual failure". Been there,
done that. Most businesses, and many home users, simply cannot afford
the
On 11/08/2017 05:11 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
Do you know why I prefer RHEL/SL 6 or 7 as my primary development
environment? That's the platforms I'm targeting as the oldest supported
releases. And that code will run on future major releases of RHEL/SL as
well as the current Fedora releases.
On 08/11/17 02:43, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> You are correct. I am not using EL Linux as it is intended.
You could just have said that instead of all the other rambling.
And _THIS_ is exactly my point when I say "Blue cars are blue" and
claiming you expect them to be orange. The simple metaphor I u
On 11/07/2017 06:22 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Same with Perl 5, although I find very few bugs in
P5 as it is mature.
Perl has has a serious issue with modular dependency hell. You don't
run into it, or run into one update breaking other components, if you
stay within a stable distribution tha
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 04:59 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> By the way, I do code in Perl 5 and 6. EL Linux is
> a nightmare with all its outdated Perl. Look
> at what I have to do to get a YUM update through:
>
> # yum --skip-broken --exclude perl-li
On 11/07/2017 04:59 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 07/11/17 23:10, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 04/11/17 01:14, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I do realize that RHEL is just next to unmaintained code.
Hey, cut the FUD crap please. And this isn't the first tim
On 07/11/17 23:10, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 11/07/2017 10:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 04/11/17 01:14, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>>
>>> I do realize that RHEL is just next to unmaintained code.
>>
>> Hey, cut the FUD crap please. And this isn't the first time you come
>> with such bullshit eith
On 11/07/2017 10:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 04/11/17 01:14, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I do realize that RHEL is just next to unmaintained code.
Hey, cut the FUD crap please. And this isn't the first time you come
with such bullshit either.
It is a long running observation and not FUD or b
On 04/11/17 01:14, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>
> I do realize that RHEL is just next to unmaintained code.
Hey, cut the FUD crap please. And this isn't the first time you come
with such bullshit either.
RHEL is fully maintained and updated according to their release process.
Bugs and security issues
On 11/03/2017 04:55 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I posted the follpwing two RFE's:
RFE: save overwrite prompt
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789890
RFE: delete, save, new scanner
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789892
And
RFE: please update simple scan
https://bugzilla.red
On 11/01/2017 02:40 AM, Todd Chester wrote:
On 10/31/2017 02:53 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 27/10/17 22:03, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:48 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
[...snip...]
So poop. Now I get to figure out why my scanner takes EIGHT
scans every time I ask for one. xscan is cu
On 10/31/2017 02:53 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 27/10/17 22:03, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 10/25/2017 12:48 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
[...snip...]
So poop. Now I get to figure out why my scanner takes EIGHT
scans every time I ask for one. xscan is cumbersome to
use at its best. I may switch to
On 27/10/17 22:03, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 10/25/2017 12:48 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
[...snip...]
> So poop. Now I get to figure out why my scanner takes EIGHT
> scans every time I ask for one. xscan is cumbersome to
> use at its best. I may switch to Simple Scan for most of
> everything. I get
On 10/25/2017 12:48 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Dear List,
Anyone out there get an Epson Perfection V19 scanner
to work with SL 7.4? Did you do anything special?
Many thanks,
-T
$ scanimage -L
device
`imagescan:esci:gt-s650:usb:/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-3/1-3:1.0'
is a
Dear List,
Anyone out there get an Epson Perfection V19 scanner
to work with SL 7.4? Did you do anything special?
Many thanks,
-T
$ scanimage -L
device
`imagescan:esci:gt-s650:usb:/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-3/1-3:1.0'
is a EPSON Epson_Perfection_V19
17 matches
Mail list logo
