Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-05-22 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
> > > http://www.muktware.com/5203/google-says-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-obsolete > Meanwhile, SL6 google-chrome updated from version 26 to version 27. Updating: google-chrome-stable x86_64 27.0.1453.93-200836 google-chrome51 M -- Konstantin Olchanski Data Acquisition Systems:

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-18 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: P.S. One thing is clear now. It looks as if people who see the warning are running chromium from chromium, not google-chrome from google. Hmm. I got mine via yum from http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64 just as described in ht

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 06:38:28PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> Hi, there. I am extremely super curious - "what warning?" > > > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/112648813199640203443/posts/7LrVTf43yz8 > >

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Clint Bowman
The message is real. I recall seeing it on a computer at home sometime within the past month--however I don't recall whether it was on my wife's Windows 7 or my Fedora box. Clint BowmanINTERNET: cl...@ecy.wa.gov Air Quality Modeler INTERNET: cl...@ma

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
> > > > Hi, there. I am extremely super curious - "what warning?" > > > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/112648813199640203443/posts/7LrVTf43yz8 > Akemi So far this is the one and only evidence of this supposed warning. Personally, I think that image is fake - the shown popup comes from the self-u

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread David Sommerseth
On 17/04/13 18:18, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Konstantin Olchanski > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:05:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: >>> >> Ever since I installed that version, google-chrome warns m

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:05:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: >> >> >>>Ever since I installed that version, google-chrome warns me that >> >>>it has stopped supporting this v

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:05:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > > >>>Ever since I installed that version, google-chrome warns me that > >>>it has stopped supporting this version of my operating system ... > > > >Meanwhile another update t

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-17 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: Ever since I installed that version, google-chrome warns me that it has stopped supporting this version of my operating system ... Meanwhile another update to google-chrome descended from heaven. Thank you. The warning was present with

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-16 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
> > >> Updates of google-chrome for SL6 have not stopped. > > > > > Ever since I installed that version, google-chrome warns me that > > it has stopped supporting this version of my operating system ... > > Meanwhile another update to google-chrome descended from heaven. And I looked and I looke

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-05 Thread Robert Arkiletian
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2) For those who haven't heard this, some links: >>> http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-03 Thread Yasha Karant
On 04/03/2013 02:15 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: 2) For those who haven't heard this, some links: http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&answer=95411 R

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-03 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: 2) For those who haven't heard this, some links: http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&answer=95411 RHEL/SL/SLC are not listed at all. No announcement anyw

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-02 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:09:45AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > 2) For those who haven't heard this, some links: > http://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en-GB&answer=95411 RHEL/SL/SLC are not listed at all. No announcement anywhere on google about adding or dropping support

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-02 Thread Robert Blair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 An odd feature of the list of supported linuxen for chrome is that it indicates fedora 14 (not fedora 14+). The current release of fedora is 18 and I didn't notice a warning on my fedora installs. I wonder if this is just a typo? On 04/02/2013 04:09

Re: Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-02 Thread zxq9
On 04/02/2013 06:09 PM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Robert Blair wrote: Slightly off topic but related: now that 1) adobe is no longer supporting flash for linux firefox plugins and 2) google is no longer supporting google-chrome on SL, do we have a flash crisis? Is there a

Flash and Chrome - was Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-02 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Robert Blair wrote: Slightly off topic but related: now that 1) adobe is no longer supporting flash for linux firefox plugins and 2) google is no longer supporting google-chrome on SL, do we have a flash crisis? Is there a plan to deal with this by TUV? 1) According to h

Re: FireFox Error

2013-04-01 Thread Robert Blair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suspect your best approach is to install a personal copy from Mozilla.org in your home area. It updates automatically and, aside from resource issues - as in how many people need to do this, should function just fine. I used to do this to get a mor

FireFox Error

2013-03-31 Thread Larry Linder
Excuse me but I have been ignoring the FireFox discussion, but now our purchasing group needs to use it. SL Linux 5.8. When I try to launch a FireFox app. The error message is: Error: Platform version '10.0.3' is not compatible with minVersion >= 10.0.12 maxVersion <= 10.0.12 Any Suggestions?