On Sat, 4 Feb 2017, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 04/02/17 03:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1530413
explains Red Hat's position on this, but it can only be read by
those with a Red Hat contract.
You don't have to have a contract, only an account. Anyone can
On 04/02/17 15:37, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On Saturday, 4 February 2017 3:29:32 PM AEDT David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 03/02/17 17:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>>> SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1, which is no longer supported by OpenSSL
>>> ( https://www.openssl.org/policies/rele
On Saturday, 4 February 2017 3:29:32 PM AEDT David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 03/02/17 17:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1, which is no longer supported by OpenSSL
> > ( https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html ).
> > v1.0.2 which may be
On 03/02/17 17:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1, which is no longer supported by OpenSSL
> ( https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html ).
> v1.0.2 which may be a drop in replacement is supported until the end of
> 2019.
Just wanted to point out tha
On 04/02/17 03:22, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1530413
> explains Red Hat's position on this, but it can only be read by
> those with a Red Hat contract.
You don't have to have a contract, only an account. Anyone can register,
and there's also free 'developer'
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:22:33PM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1...
>
> ... I'm trying to build the latest exim, which does not support openssl
> v1.0.1 ...
>
You can try to build exim against LibreSSL
https://www.libressl.org/
https://github.com/li
SL6 uses OpenSSL v1.0.1, which is no longer supported by OpenSSL
( https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html ).
v1.0.2 which may be a drop in replacement is supported until the end of
2019.
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1530413
explains Red Hat's position on this, but it can
