Good catch. Somehow the signature got reverted to the RC image.
The correct signature is
68992289a1163250ba064c23baa8c4b23d11e5dc0562de41971bdf9c2ad42415
I'll get a new set of SHA files posted. Sorry for the error.
On 04/01/2017 03:06 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
Hi,
Is the following hash the corr
G
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov]
> Sent: 星期一, 四月 03, 2017 22:20
> To: Fred Liu; scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
> Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] is the sha256sum of
> SL-7.3-x86_64-netinst.iso correct?
>
>