I already converted over my personal systems over to Springdale Linux
without having to reinstall because it saved me from having to reinstall
Debian from scratch on all of my systems.
On 12/14/20 12:37 PM, Tapia, Ron wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone considering Springdale Linux
(https://urldefense.proo
Springdale EL (Princeton in my terminology, just as SL is Fermilab/CERN)
shows the following:
Download
DVD
i386x86_64
8.3 TBA TBA
That is, there is no repo with an installable EL 8 ISO image. As for
repos, Springdale shows:
If you are only looking to install some rpms, you can
Spring is a binary clone of RHEL and the sources are not based off CentOS.
Quoting someone from the Springdale mailinglist: "Springdale Linux
formerly known as PUIAS (Princeton University Institute for Advanced
Studies) is older than CentOS and it compiles it's own binaries from the
upstream
Thank you for quoting from the Princeton material. I had read the
Princeton commentary a while ago when internally we were debating SL vs.
Princeton, and went with SL because Fermilab/CERN combined have better
resources than Princeton alone. The one thing I did note and have
mentioned on this
Software collections has gcc-9. If memory serves, SL7 has gcc-4.8.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Yasha Karant
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 2:44 PM
To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Springdale Linux
Thank
>
> > and ... CentOS RPMs are not 100% safe ...
>
This is a very unexpected statement. I feel it should not be passed
unquestioned.
Is there any meat there or it's just a general statement on the security
of the CentOS build process vs the security of the Red Hat build process
vs the security of
.
*From:* owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Yasha
Karant
*Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2020 2:44 PM
*To:* scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
*Subject:* Re: Springdale Linux
Thank you for quoting from the Princeton material. I had read the
Princeton commentary a while
Is there a way to see the Springdale mailing list archive?
Ching Him
As I recall, what you state below is similar in sentiment to response/s
when I noted the "same" comment concerning Princeton EL in the past. I
take it from your response no one in the larger EL community (including
HPC/HTC) shares the Princeton "sentiment" and that there is no "basis in
data/f
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__springdale.math.ias.edu_wiki_disclaimer&d=DwIDaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=TKmDwHk4LwNB8HNm9GxxajVITvc216grjypu8En4mdU&s=uUu-gODJfybAXFqRmgXY4raUbPDlRs1FwEOl4N70nRg&e=
"This sof
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:27:31PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >>
> >>>and ... CentOS RPMs are not 100% safe ...
> >
> >This is a very unexpected statement. I feel it should not be passed
> >unquestioned.
> >
To followup on myself. Need a definition of "unsafe". Must make
a distinction between "
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM Konstantin Olchanski
wrote:
> To followup on myself. Need a definition of "unsafe". Must make
> a distinction between "centos is unsafe" vs "redhat is unsafe" vs
> "linux is unsafe" vs "any use of computer is unsafe".
>
> ("safe as certified by recognized authority
12 matches
Mail list logo
