Hi Larry,

Thanks for the feedback. Can you please share more details on what you
reported and to whom? I doubt that we would shoot the messenger as we are
pretty responsive to everyone. If you provide me with more details or a
link to something I can try and see first, how we can help you and second,
why no one has yet. That is very atypical behavior.

Thanks,
Jack

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:03 PM Larry Linder <
00000dea520dd180-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote:

> Microsoft has about 15 updates to windows 10 maybe more.  It has one
> theme good or bad.  It is moron aware so it fits a lot of the
> population.
>
> We are still using RHEL 6.5 upgraded to 6.10 so we have the 32 libs for
> a lot of our engineering cad packages.
>
> In the lab is a 7.6 box running that is used for the TI processor stuff.
> The main server is SL 6.2 -> SL 6.10.  Works well.
>
> Rocky we have not evaluated yet.
>
> Our new box is an 8 core processor with 32 G of memory - almalinux is
> going to be installed shortly.  Mainly to ditch the idiot Gnome desktop.
> We have evaluated almalinux 8.4 without a desktop and as a command line
> driven device it really works well and is stable.  It also has the
> RedHat built in flaw.  When in the manual-option it will wipe out you
> file system completely, including the disk that contains the
> install .iso.
>
> I told the alma developers about it and gave them an example and they
> shot the messenger.  Just like the kids at Fedora.
> Formula on how to kill a linux OS.  I mean wipe all the disks attached.
> Remove a Software package, change you mind, reinstall it, Remove it and
> any disk attached is gone - wiped clean.
>
> This is why we have not moved forward.  Some of our engineers are pretty
> inventive and like to change things on their computers.  We do not
> discourage it.  The core file system is the same for back up purposes
> but almost anything else is done.
>
> This puts us in a sort of stop mode for upgrading to a new linux.
>
> The end of our fooling around is pretty near and the thought is to
> migrate to an apple.
> The SL relationship served us well.  The community was always a great
> help, we thank them,  but there is not a clear path to the future.  We
> just can't wait any longer to get developers to fix core issues.  This
> problem started when IBM rewrote the Linux code in C++ at start of RHEL
> 7.  This is a guess because things worked perfectly until then.
>
> If the upstream developers are interested I can give them an example of
> how to wipe a linux file system.
>
> Merry Christmas
> Larry Linder
> MicroControls LLC
>
  • SL 6.5 User Larry Linder
    • Re: SL 6.5 User Jack Aboutboul

Reply via email to