On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 08:18:14PM -0800, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
> root@daq00:~# ssh ladd00
> Unable to negotiate with 142.90.111.60 port 22: no matching host key type
> found. Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
> bash-3.2$ ssh -
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:52 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> Keith, thanks. In practice, experiment data is not "perpetual",
> life time of typical physics experiment is about 5-10 years after
> the last data taking. Afterwards, people tend to dissipate (retire,
> graduate and move on, just mov
oL-YN98J8rk-_HM9HbQ8&e=
Alex
On 10/01/2023 19:49, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
From: Konstantin Olchanski
Subject: Re: SL6 ssh fail
...
It looks like my remaining option is to build openssh from OpenBSD "portable"
sources.
...
- "so old" - like a grand-father's axe
fixed the hard
way.
K.O.
> Another condecending Unix / Linux user.
> By the way my great,great,great grandfather was a Hessian solder and
> decided he like the country, jumped ship, married a lady and had 12
> Children.
>
> Larry Linder
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2023-01-10
tive
tracers
for medical imaging). This concludes your virtual tour of TRIUMF. You are
welcome.
K.O.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Olchanski
> > Subject: Re: SL6 ssh fail
> ...
> > It looks like my remaining option is to bui
ther was a Hessian solder and
decided he like the country, jumped ship, married a lady and had 12
Children.
Larry Linder
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 11:49 -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Olchanski
> > Subject: Re: SL6 ssh fail
> ...
> > It looks like my remaining
> From: Konstantin Olchanski
> Subject: Re: SL6 ssh fail
...
> It looks like my remaining option is to build openssh from OpenBSD "portable"
> sources.
...
> - "so old" - like a grand-father's axe, most our SL6 machines hardware was
> upgraded 2-3 ti
I respectfully disagree -- I really do not attempt to distribute the IBM
marketing tactic of "fear, uncertainty, doubt" (adopted by other
entities as well). However, when Ubuntu LTS lists an update as a
security update, I do take notice. SL derived from RHEL did the same if
memory serves. Yo
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:09 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:26:33PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >
> > The SL6 issue is a different matter. Not only are various
> > applications vulnerable to compromises from the Internet, but so is
> > the kernel as well as kernel s
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:03 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:04:19PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > ... you can validate the source tarballs and review any patches and the
> > .spec file.
> >
>
> no, I cannot validate and review this. I am not clever enough.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:26:33PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
>
> The SL6 issue is a different matter. Not only are various
> applications vulnerable to compromises from the Internet, but so is
> the kernel as well as kernel systems support software.
>
This is FUD. Which applications, which expl
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:04:19PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> ... you can validate the source tarballs and review any patches and the .spec
> file.
>
no, I cannot validate and review this. I am not clever enough. Could never
figure out
even obfuscated C contest puzzles, forget about cy
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 4:15 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:48:33AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > There is a third party SRPM at:
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rnd.rajven.net_centos_6_os_SRPMS_openssh-2D6.4p1-2D1cnt6
The hardware issue with VME not connected to any external (Internet
accessible) network is a fact of life.
The SL6 issue is a different matter. Not only are various applications
vulnerable to compromises from the Internet, but so is the kernel as
well as kernel systems support software. As v
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:48:33AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> There is a third party SRPM at:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rnd.rajven.net_centos_6_os_SRPMS_openssh-2D6.4p1-2D1cnt6.1.src.rpm&d=DwIBaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 1:51 AM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
> >
> > SL 6 is obsolete, maybe time to upgrade?
> >
>
>
> Looking on my list of SL6 machines:
There is a third party SRPM at:
https://urldefen
On 2023-01-07 07:50, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
SL 6 is obsolete, maybe time to upgrade?
Looking on my list of SL6 machines:
experiment stations: dragon, musr, bnmr/bnqr, pol, titan. these are
medium/small sized experim
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 1:51 AM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
> >
> > SL 6 is obsolete, maybe time to upgrade?
> >
>
>
> Looking on my list of SL6 machines:
>
> experiment stations: dragon, musr, bnmr/bnqr, pol, titan.
> >
> > I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
>
> SL 6 is obsolete, maybe time to upgrade?
>
Looking on my list of SL6 machines:
experiment stations: dragon, musr, bnmr/bnqr, pol, titan. these are
medium/small sized experiments,
all software updates must be coordin
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:18 PM Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
SL 6 is obsolete, the upstream RHEL 6 is out of primary support for
more than 2 years. Maybe time to upgrade?
> root@daq00:~# ssh ladd00
> Unable to negotiate with
I cannot ssh to SL6 machines from current MacOS or Debian 20 or 22:
root@daq00:~# ssh ladd00
Unable to negotiate with 142.90.111.60 port 22: no matching host key type
found. Their offer: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
Are there updated ssh rpm packages anywhere?
In the mean time, this workaround works for me:
21 matches
Mail list logo
