On 09/27/2013 08:53 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Yasha Karant mailto:ykar...@csusb.edu>> wrote:
Quoting from a previous post on this subject (thread) not from me:
UEFI is part of the old "Palladium" project from Microsoft,
relabeled as "Trusted Comp
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> Quoting from a previous post on this subject (thread) not from me:
>
> UEFI is part of the old "Palladium" project from Microsoft, relabeled as
> "Trusted Computing". It is aimed squarely at DRM and vendor lock-in, not
> security
>
> End quo
Quoting from a previous post on this subject (thread) not from me:
UEFI is part of the old "Palladium" project from Microsoft, relabeled as
"Trusted Computing". It is aimed squarely at DRM and vendor lock-in, not
security
End quote.
Is the above language inflammatory? If not, how is my lang
I don't think that's directly what has been said, Yasha. In less loaded
terms it appears there are motherboard vendors who are not strictly
compliant with the UEFI specification and do not allow you to turn off
UEFI without using some software with Microsoft roots. They have elected
to leave out,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:42:32PM -0700, Yasha Karant wrote:
> A colleague who uses SuSE non-enterprise for his professional
> (enterprise) workstations has now attempted to load the latest SuSE
> on a machine with a new generic (aftermarket) "gamer" UEFI X86-64
> motherboard. It does not proper
A colleague who uses SuSE non-enterprise for his professional
(enterprise) workstations has now attempted to load the latest SuSE on a
machine with a new generic (aftermarket) "gamer" UEFI X86-64
motherboard. It does not properly boot. I do not have any UEFI
motherboards, and thus no experie
