On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:58:21PM -0500, Ken Teh wrote:
>
> I read the following article on systemd ...
>
I was accidentally exposed to systemd by running Fedora-20 on an ARM machine
(no SL6 for ARM, so...)
and I can make a few comments:
- no noticable change in boot times or memory usage on F2
On 26/08/14 14:01, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 9:42 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
[...snip...]
> Ok, so off the top of my head, the following is broken with systemd as
> of right now:
>
> 1) Logwatch doesn't work at all with journals.
>
> 2) You can't pipe the journal to a different machine
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
>> - simple and predictable service files
>
> Like my case of networking randomly failing to start. No debugging or
> errors logged, and no way of predicting a failure.
For debugging:
systemct
On 26/08/2014 9:42 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/08/14 01:57, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
>>> Hi Ken Teh!
>>>
>>> On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
>>>
I read the following article on systemd
http://ifwnewsletters.n
On 26/08/14 01:57, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
>> Hi Ken Teh!
>>
>> On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
>>
>>> I read the following article on systemd
>>>
>>> http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
>
Hi Steven Haigh!
On 2014.08.26 at 09:57:22 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote next:
> > - simple and predictable service files
>
> Like my case of networking randomly failing to start. No debugging or
> errors logged, and no way of predicting a failure.
Err, where did you find system where systemd init
On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
> Hi Ken Teh!
>
> On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
>
>> I read the following article on systemd
>>
>> http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
>>
>> The comments suggested one could still re
Hi Ken Teh!
On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
> I read the following article on systemd
>
> http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
>
> The comments suggested one could still revert to sysvinit. Is this just
> wishful thinking on my p
I read the following article on systemd
http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
The comments suggested one could still revert to sysvinit. Is this just
wishful thinking on my part?
