On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:58:21PM -0500, Ken Teh wrote:
I read the following article on systemd ...
I was accidentally exposed to systemd by running Fedora-20 on an ARM machine
(no SL6 for ARM, so...)
and I can make a few comments:
- no noticable change in boot times or memory usage on F20
Hi Steven Haigh!
On 2014.08.26 at 09:57:22 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote next:
- simple and predictable service files
Like my case of networking randomly failing to start. No debugging or
errors logged, and no way of predicting a failure.
Err, where did you find system where systemd
On 26/08/14 01:57, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi Ken Teh!
On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
I read the following article on systemd
http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
The comments
On 26/08/2014 9:42 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 26/08/14 01:57, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi Ken Teh!
On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
I read the following article on systemd
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote:
On 26/08/2014 9:36 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
- simple and predictable service files
Like my case of networking randomly failing to start. No debugging or
errors logged, and no way of predicting a failure.
For
I read the following article on systemd
http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
The comments suggested one could still revert to sysvinit. Is this just
wishful thinking on my part?
Hi Ken Teh!
On 2014.08.25 at 12:58:21 -0500, Ken Teh wrote next:
I read the following article on systemd
http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/9625863/474699771/826094/14/
The comments suggested one could still revert to sysvinit. Is this just
wishful thinking on my part?
