Hi Larry,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Hi Connie,
Connie Sieh wrote on 2/26/2009 2:00 PM:
[snip...]
My main question is, lacking any explicit protocol designation in the
fstab,
how can one tell which protocol a client is using?
mount
Actually, 'mount' does not s
Suneel Dutt wrote:
Hi All,
I know this is not the right forum to ask my question as I am not a
scientific-linux user. I have fedora 10 installed on my laptop.
But since my problem appears to be a general problem independent of the
platform so I am daring to ask that problem. (I may be wro
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Wiesand wrote on 2/27/2009 2:00 AM:
Hi Larry,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Hi Connie,
Connie Sieh wrote on 2/26/2009 2:00 PM:
[snip...]
My main question is, lacking any explicit protocol designation in
the fstab,
how can one tell which protocol a cl
I *think* what has to happen is we need to push out the new cpuspeed
that is in SL 5.3 to everyone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459441
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0098.html
Basically, it looks like what happened was the powernow-k8 changes from
being built into the ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm confused on this. I have cpuspeed installed - this contains no
nodules. It only has an executable and a startup script. What has this
to do with a kernel change?
I did try installing the rpm and /sbin/modprobe powernow-k8 resulted in:
FATAL: E
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Robert E. Blair wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--Boundary_(ID_CwsXHMC4AqZN01f3dJ++AQ)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm confused on this. I ha
I guess I didn't specify this.
This is for AMD processors only, specifically those with powernow.
The cpuspeed *doesn't* have a kernel module, but the new 2.6.18-128 does
have a new kernel module specifically called powernow-k8.
This cpuspeed needs to get pushed out with the last kernel errata th
On 17/02/2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
> I have just successfully booted my Acer AspireOne on the SL 5.3 Beta 2 Live
> CD. I wasn't able to do that with SL 5.1 or SL 5.2. So it looks like
> whatever the problems were, have gotten fixed with SL 5.3.
> I know it's not fully released ye