Re: SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100% in relation with the bond0 module

2009-03-31 Thread Jean-Michel Barbet
Michael Mansour wrote: For this (on a 5.2 i386 box), I have: options bond0 mode=1 miimon=100 use_carrier=1 and it's never failed. Thanks Michael, it could be x86_64 specific maybe... JM -- Jean-michel BARBET

Re: SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100% in relation with the bond0 module

2009-03-31 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Jean-Michel Barbet wrote: Michael Mansour wrote: For this (on a 5.2 i386 box), I have: options bond0 mode=1 miimon=100 use_carrier=1 and it's never failed. Thanks Michael, it could be x86_64 specific maybe... Or it could be pure statistics. It also depends on usage.

Selinux preventing spamc from working.

2009-03-31 Thread John Franks
Troy Dawson wrote: And the dbus update required an updated selinux-policy for SL 50, 51 and 52. We apologize for any problems this oversight might have caused. It appears that the new selinux-policy will not allow spamc to be run by procmail. This effectively disables spamassassin. Is

SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100%

2009-03-31 Thread W. J. Kossler
I have had system freezes, but am not running a server or bonding. It is a sl5.2 x86_64 system. I noticed that acroread was running, though it should not have been and was using ever increasing cpu percentage as the system proceeded to freeze. I've made a soft link to evince from where acroread

Re: Selinux preventing spamc from working.

2009-03-31 Thread Alec T. Habig
John Franks writes: It appears that the new selinux-policy will not allow spamc to be run by procmail. This effectively disables spamassassin. Is there any way to fix this? I am being inundated by spam. This is SL 51 (x86_64). This is in bugs:

Re: SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100%

2009-03-31 Thread Craig Moore
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:26 -0400, W. J. Kossler wrote: I have had system freezes, but am not running a server or bonding. It is a sl5.2 x86_64 system. I noticed that acroread was running, though it should not have been and was using ever increasing cpu percentage as the system proceeded to

Re: SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100%

2009-03-31 Thread Connie Sieh
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. J. Kossler wrote: I have had system freezes, but am not running a server or bonding. It is a sl5.2 x86_64 system. I noticed that acroread was running, though it should not have been and was using ever increasing cpu percentage as the system proceeded to freeze. I've

Re: SL5.2 Machine freeze due to CPU100%

2009-03-31 Thread Jon Peatfield
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Craig Moore wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:26 -0400, W. J. Kossler wrote: I have had system freezes, but am not running a server or bonding. It is a sl5.2 x86_64 system. I noticed that acroread was running, though it should not have been and was using ever increasing cpu