Has anyone with a TAM with RedHat reported this to them yet?
You mean
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2009-2692, right?
Is there anyone here with access to the depends upon bugs
516950 516951 516952 516953 516954 516955 517444 517445
who can tell us what is taking Red Hat so
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:17 +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Has anyone with a TAM with RedHat reported this to them yet?
You mean
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2009-2692, right?
Is there anyone here with access to the depends upon bugs
516950 516951 516952 516953
Hi Troy, Connie,
So, there's a new kernel out for SL4x, 2.6.9-89.0.7.
From the ERRATA you sent out (see edited email below), it appears this
does *not* fix the vulnerability (CVE-2009-2692) that I just mitigated
with the module-remove/move-to-a-safedir script I just ran over the
weekend - true?