Re: kernel security

2009-08-19 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
Has anyone with a TAM with RedHat reported this to them yet? You mean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2009-2692, right? Is there anyone here with access to the depends upon bugs 516950 516951 516952 516953 516954 516955 517444 517445 who can tell us what is taking Red Hat so

Re: kernel security

2009-08-19 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:17 +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: Has anyone with a TAM with RedHat reported this to them yet? You mean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2009-2692, right? Is there anyone here with access to the depends upon bugs 516950 516951 516952 516953

latest kernel and CVE-2692

2009-08-19 Thread P. Larry Nelson
Hi Troy, Connie, So, there's a new kernel out for SL4x, 2.6.9-89.0.7. From the ERRATA you sent out (see edited email below), it appears this does *not* fix the vulnerability (CVE-2009-2692) that I just mitigated with the module-remove/move-to-a-safedir script I just ran over the weekend - true?