Final update,
after a very productive exchange via the redhat bug tracking system, it
turned out my BIOS was causing the problem. Flashed the latest version an
d
voila it works like a charm. (Samsung Q45 BIOS ST7 to version ST11)
Before that I could get it to boot with kernel options pci=nomsi
Troy J Dawson wrote:
Klaus Steinberger wrote:
...
it looks like the plugin for 64bit firefox is missing from the rpm.
Could you please build it also, it is in jdk sinc update 11 or so.
Sincerly,
Klaus
Where are you getting sun's jdk that has the x86_64 plugin?
It's not in anything that I
The x86_64 java plugin is here
/usr/java/java version/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so
I'll work on updating java-1.6.0-sun-compat to include this.
Fine! That will solve some massive problems here.
Sincerly,
Klaus Steinberger
attachment: klaus_steinberger.vcf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
And where from do we get the Adobe Flash plugin for Firefox, 64-bit?
Many thanks !!
- Anatoly Solomin
Troy Dawson wrote on 11/12/2009 03:59 PM:
Troy J Dawson wrote:
Klaus Steinberger wrote:
...
it looks like the plugin for 64bit firefox is missing from the rpm.
Could you please build it
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing last nite's update hang on SL5.1 systems?
Near as I can tell, it's hanging on cups-1.3.7-11.el5_4.3.
I have 3 SL5.1 systems (all the 5.3 systems updated just fine)
that I did not get yum cron email from this morning, so went
investigating.
A 'ps auxw | grep yum' on one
I saw it last night, too, and it happened again when I tried yum
update a few minutes ago (not long after noon CST) after rebooting an
SL5.1 machine.
Steven Yellin
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing last nite's update hang on SL5.1 systems?
Near as I
Back when we originally tried to release this version of cups, we
determined that a newer version of rpm was needed.
But in our tests, we didn't have any systems just hang. They all were
spewing these odd messages.
What happens if you update rpm before updating cups?
Maybe we need to pull cups
I first did the rpm* updates; then yum update completed without
problems.
Steven Yellin
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Back when we originally tried to release this version of cups, we determined
that a newer version of rpm was needed.
But in our tests, we didn't have any
Troy,
Troy Dawson wrote on 11/12/2009 1:18 PM:
Back when we originally tried to release this version of cups, we
determined that a newer version of rpm was needed.
But in our tests, we didn't have any systems just hang. They all were
spewing these odd messages.
What happens if you update rpm
OK, just shows that no matter how well you test something, you never
know until it goes live.
Well, I'll pull the cups update out of the repo's, and leave the rpm
part in. I'll make a note to push cups out in a couple weeks.
Sorry about that.
Troy
P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Troy,
Troy Dawson
Troy Dawson wrote on 11/12/2009 1:43 PM:
OK, just shows that no matter how well you test something, you never
know until it goes live.
Well, I'll pull the cups update out of the repo's, and leave the rpm
part in. I'll make a note to push cups out in a couple weeks.
Sorry about that.
Troy
No
It's part of the yum-utils rpm which is not
installed by default in SL but is available via yum install
If you're running a Red Hat 5 system (as opposed to SL5)
it's indispensable to have yum-complete-transaction; you end
up using it a lot.
Steve
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
yum-complete-transaction is in yum-utils-1.1.16-14.el5.noarch.
Steven Yellin
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Troy Dawson wrote on 11/12/2009 1:43 PM:
OK, just shows that no matter how well you test something, you never know
until it goes live.
Well, I'll pull the cups update
Hi Steve, starting a new thread here as this has segued off the
original subject.
Steven Timm wrote on 11/12/2009 1:59 PM:
It's part of the yum-utils rpm which is not
installed by default in SL but is available via yum install
If you're running a Red Hat 5 system (as opposed to SL5)
it's
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
Hi Steve, starting a new thread here as this has segued off the
original subject.
Steven Timm wrote on 11/12/2009 1:59 PM:
It's part of the yum-utils rpm which is not
installed by default in SL but is available via yum install
If you're running a
Steve,
Steven Timm wrote on 11/12/2009 3:03 PM:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
[snip...]
The concerned part: I know I can easily install yum-utils (now that
I know about it), but why is it not included in SL, and more importantly
is there a possibility that something
Supercomputing'09 is at the Oregon Convention Center in Portland
next week ( Nov 14-21 ). I won't be at the whole conference, but
I have an exhibits pass and may attempt to organize an offsite
BOF or two. I'm local and have a car.
The Portland Linux/Unix group has two events of note that week:
17 matches
Mail list logo
