Please consider addition of gnuplot42

2010-03-19 Thread Steve Traylen
Hi, I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4) These are some packages here I've done: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/ which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages present in SL4/5. I do have an open review here for EPEL: https://bugzilla.red

Re: Please consider addition of gnuplot42

2010-03-19 Thread Jon Peatfield
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Steve Traylen wrote: Hi, I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4) These are some packages here I've done: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/ which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages present in SL4/5. I do have an open revie

SL archives and indexed postings not accessible

2010-03-19 Thread William Lutter
I find that on both firefox linux and IE winxp that I can't access either archived messages or Indexed links in the listserv.fnal.gov emails. I get a MS "The page cannot be found" screen. Uh, am I missing some new development? I figure everyone should also have this problem. It's been occur

Re: SL archives and indexed postings not accessible

2010-03-19 Thread Mark Stodola
Works fine for me on FF under SL 5.2. I navigated from listserv.fnal.gov to the archives, then chose SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS, selected a random month and clicked on a random message. -Mark William Lutter wrote: I find that on both firefox linux and IE winxp that I can't access either archived

No, yum, gcc43 not gcc44

2010-03-19 Thread Brett Viren
This is probably a FAQ but I couldn't find the answer. I want to install gcc43 packages on SL 5.3 64bit so I do: yum install gcc43 gcc43-c++ gcc43-gfortran But yum ignores my command and says that "gcc43 is obsoleted by gcc44" and instead installs gcc44! Complete insolence. How can I tell yu

Re: No, yum, gcc43 not gcc44

2010-03-19 Thread Peter Elmer
Hi Brett, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:47:39PM -0400, Brett Viren wrote: > This is probably a FAQ but I couldn't find the answer. > > I want to install gcc43 packages on SL 5.3 64bit so I do: > > yum install gcc43 gcc43-c++ gcc43-gfortran > > But yum ignores my command and says that "gcc43 i

Re: No, yum, gcc43 not gcc44

2010-03-19 Thread Brett Viren
Hi Pete, Peter Elmer writes: > There were also other oddities about the "gcc43 preview" build, e.g. > difficulties building boost, that caused the LHC experiments to reject it > in favor of our own build(s) of the stock gcc43x. (Subsequent to that > decision > the "preview" switched to gcc4.

Re: SL archives and indexed postings not accessible

2010-03-19 Thread Serguei Mokhov
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Mark Stodola wrote: > Works fine for me on FF under SL 5.2. > I navigated from listserv.fnal.gov to the archives, then chose > SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS, selected a random month and clicked on a random > message. Ditto. Works for me. -s > -Mark > > William Lutter w

Re: No, yum, gcc43 not gcc44

2010-03-19 Thread Peter Elmer
Hi Brett, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:27:16PM -0400, Brett Viren wrote: > Peter Elmer writes: > > > There were also other oddities about the "gcc43 preview" build, e.g. > > difficulties building boost, that caused the LHC experiments to reject it > > in favor of our own build(s) of the stock

Re: No, yum, gcc43 not gcc44

2010-03-19 Thread Wayne Betts
Peter Elmer wrote: > I'm pretty certain that Atlas isn't using the OS-install of the "preview" > build, but rather a build of the compiler in their own software area, but > you should check with someone from Atlas in case I am missing something. > They were part of the discussions that chose to