Michael Mansour wrote:
...
I'm confused as to what you're asking. If you'd like to pay someone for
supporting your Linux distribution, then maybe SL have a donation system?
No. We do not have a donation and/or payment system for Scientific Linux.
We have no plans for implementing a donation
Dear Users
Am planning to install scientific Linux for my new laptop HP Dv6 - 2129el
(Intel Core i5 430M). Which version is good? and x86_64 or i386 which one i
have to choose.
--
with regards,
B.Madusudhanan,
any comment?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4)
These are some packages here I've done:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/
which are designed to not interfere with the existing
I've never put linux on a laptop, but the latest version of Scientific
Linux is 5.4, and the Intel Core i5 Processor i5-430M of your laptop has
64 bit architecture, so if it were up to me, I'd try Scientific Linux 5.4
x86_64.
Steven Yellin
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, madhus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/25/2010 07:31 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
I've never put linux on a laptop, but the latest version of
Scientific Linux is 5.4, and the Intel Core i5 Processor i5-430M of
your laptop has 64 bit architecture, so if it were up to me, I'd try
Scientific Linux 5.4 x86_64.
If you have
OK, first problem.
This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux.
Is that an important part? Can it be removed as a dependancy?
Do we want to also put that into SL?
Troy
Troy J Dawson wrote:
Hi Steve,
Sorry for not getting back to this.
I think it looks ok. I am goign to put it into
Thanks for all the suggestions. Anaconda still did some rearranging, but
I eventually figured out what I needed to do to get what I wanted. I had to
use `Edit' to set the starting and ending cylinders as well as use the
Primary Partition check box. I had to use `Edit' for all the
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov wrote:
OK, first problem.
This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux.
Is that an important part? Can it be removed as a dependancy?
Do we want to also put that into SL?
Doh, I never thought to check that it actually
Vladimir Belov wrote:
Hello.
I have SL 5.4 x86_64 system installed. Recently I tried to compile program
which requires FFTW library. I have fftw3-3.1.2-5.el5.1 (and corresponding
-devel) installed from the SL repository. 64-bit build was perfect and
32-bit
failed due to missing libraries. I
Hello everyone,
Yesterday when I was test a newly installed program I force to close the
terminal as it was in a statu waiting for my next operation.Then a problem
comes up, when I turn on the terminal again It was not what it should be as
[u...@hostname]:#~or somthing like that, instead it
On 3/25/2010 14:43, Steve Traylen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Troy Dawsondaw...@fnal.gov wrote:
OK, first problem.
This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux.
Is that an important part? Can it be removed as a dependancy?
Do we want to also put that into SL?
Doh, I
On 3/25/2010 14:00, Urs Beyerle wrote:
If you have less or equal 4 GB of RAM, I would go with i386 instead of
x86_64. Because of browser plugins (flash, java) and javaws.
While I can't say anything about javaws, the 64-bit Flash plugin from
Adobe and the 64-bit OpenJDK from SL worked just
12 matches
Mail list logo
