Re: SL6: NIS, AUTOFS incompatible with NetworkManager

2011-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:55:33AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: >> On Thursday, June 09, 2011 07:21:29 PM you wrote: >> > The curses based, text compatible system-config-network needs >> > everything a typical desktop or server needs. It l

Re: SL6: NIS, AUTOFS incompatible with NetworkManager

2011-06-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, June 10, 2011 09:21:43 PM you wrote: > One issue is GUI vs TUI. NetworkManager per se does not require a GUI. There is a fairly functional CLI client to activate and deactivate connections, and a pretty well documented set of directives to put in those same flat files that have been

Re: SL6: NIS, AUTOFS incompatible with NetworkManager

2011-06-11 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Jon Peatfield wrote: > > The TUV's technical notes for 6.0 say: > > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Technical_Notes/networking.html > > 5. Networking > > NetworkManager > NetworkManager is enabled by default if it is installed. Ho

Re: value of RAM reported not correct in SLC 5.6

2011-06-11 Thread Alain Péan
Le 10/06/2011 17:03, Stijn De Weirdt a écrit : we are running SL5.6 x86_64 (2.6.18-238.9.1) on a 96GB machine without issues. Hi all, It's a little bit off topic, but I thought that SLC was the CERN variant of Scientific Linux. And SL 5.6 is not yet released. I saw that SLC 5.6 was released

Re: SL6: NIS, AUTOFS incompatible with NetworkManager

2011-06-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, June 10, 2011 08:18:47 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Heh. Why would you want to stick with such an old codebase, Nico? [snip] > > Because it works well over SSH remote connections, [snip] > > Should I go on? This is an old subj

Re: value of RAM reported not correct in SLC 5.6

2011-06-11 Thread Lamar Owen
On Friday, June 10, 2011 08:29:49 PM you wrote: > It's problematic, especially if one leaves > the 32-bit versions of components and libraries dual-installed with > the 64-bit, deletes one and not the other. Multilib support can indeed be a problem. In a very large memory system one would be wi

Re: Firefox 4?

2011-06-11 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt wrote: On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote:

Re: Firefox 4?

2011-06-11 Thread John H. Outlan CPA
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Todd And Margo Chester < toddandma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt < > alexander.d.h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote: >> >> Hi,