Hi...
Just a curiousity...
i looked at my updates and saw this (output below )...
my curiousity was drawn to the sl6.2? I checked on sl website...
http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/
checked in 6x, it has release-docs for 6.1
https://lwn.net/Articles/457383/
checked here and saw it was
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, lee wrote:
Hi...
Just a curiousity...
i looked at my updates and saw this (output below )...
my curiousity was drawn to the sl6.2? I checked on sl website...
http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/
checked in 6x, it has release-docs for 6.1
https://lwn.net/Articles/45738
After a recent hacking certificate. And after the council to turn it offin
your browser or upgrade:
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/08/29/fraudulent-google-com-certificate/
In Firefox test builds of the certificate no longer exists, but in 3.6.20
it still hangs, despite the claimed security
I am no longer able to do a routine "yum update" due to two packages that
require newer versions of their dependencies than are available in SL repos.
Package cryptsetup-luks-libs was causing problem since the beginning of
August, and openldap started in last week or so. I have repos sl,
sl-securit
Hello all again,
So, looking through the source of the openldap TLS stuff, I've found where the
message is happening:
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;a=blob;f=libraries/libldap/tls_m.c;h=c85d322014fa838341f3fefdea9a5f693fadc079;hb=f7a0fc9f8b7fa9cfecd6a075b2867abd149dd0de#l
On 09/02/2011 03:49 PM, Maciej Puzio wrote:
I am no longer able to do a routine "yum update" due to two packages that
require newer versions of their dependencies than are available in SL repos.
Package cryptsetup-luks-libs was causing problem since the beginning of
August, and openldap started i
Hello all, solved this:
[root@host html]# cd /etc/openldap/cacerts/
[root@host cacerts]# certutil -A -n "" -t PC -i
/etc/openldap/cacerts/.pem -d .
[root@host cacerts]# chmod +r *.db
[root@host cacerts]# ls -la
total 108
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Sep 2 15:08 .
drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 S
Pat, "yum clean all" had no effect, however your reply pushed my
investigation into a new direction and I was able to figure out what was
wrong. Following an advice from this list, some time ago I had modified the
repo file for sl-fastbugs, by replacing "$releasever" with "6x". I believed
(wrongly)
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Maciej Puzio wrote:
> Pat, "yum clean all" had no effect, however your reply pushed my
> investigation into a new direction and I was able to figure out what was
> wrong. Following an advice from this list, some time ago I had modified the
> repo file for sl-fastbug
Hello,
I noticed the following messages in /var/log/message on many machines
under SL5.6:
Aug 24 22:05:27 hart kernel: kobject_add failed for usbdev1.2_ep81 with
-EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory.
Aug 24 22:05:27 hart kernel:
Aug 24 22:05:27 hart ker
Hi Guys,
sl6, 64 bit
bind
bind-chroot
I am trying to migrate my DNS (bind, named) over from Cent OS 5.6
to SL 6. (Yes, I am a refugee who liked the SL community and decided
to stay.) When I try starting /etc/rc.d/init.d/named, I get
# service named start
Starting named:
Hi Guys,
If any of you are still running 64 bit firefox4 from Fedora people on sl6.x,
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/firefox4/epel-6/x86_64/
(which has been taken down) would you mind doing an
rpm -qa | grep -i leigh
and copy and pasting the result?
Many thanks,
-T
12 matches
Mail list logo
