Re: SL6.1, openmpi and infiniband!

2012-01-30 Thread Sven Sternberger
Hello Stefan! On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:24 +0100, Stephan Wiesand wrote: Have you tried the openmpi packages from 6.2 beta? Good lead. We tried them and they work like a charm. So we will upgrade the packages from 1.4.3 to 1.5.3. Regrettably the compat packages from 1.5.3 are in the same way

RE: missing iptables modules and filters in all SL distributions

2012-01-30 Thread SCHAER Frederic
Hi, Thanks for the replies, I'll look at the statistics module (but I think I already tried and it wasn't there either) - actually, I'm not coming from any iptables version, I just read the manual available on the machines and attempted to use what's in that manual... Clusterip is in fact

Re: xrandr is driving me batty

2012-01-30 Thread Ken Teh
I can add modelines to whatever is running because xrandr reports them. When I try to set them with xrandr --output default --mode modename I always get 'configure crtc 0 failed' There's also some esoteric message when I first load the modeline, could not set crtc 262 So, still no go on

nfs client outbound ports

2012-01-30 Thread Elijah Buck
Hello, I have an NFSv3 server that allows mounts from unprivileged ports, and a SL6 NFS client with untrusted users (but root is trusted). I want to prevent users from mounting the NFS share from an unprivileged port. My hope was that I could put iptables rules on the SL6 NFS client: -A OUTPUT

(XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Andrew Z
Hello, i'm not sure how to get the xpdf to print pdf documents in user firendly ( aka menu driven ) way. So i looked into alternative. My attempt to get MUPDF were not successful - apparently the needed libs are too new for us. and to install Okular i have to install KDE. Old friend Acrobat

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Mored Lopes Berdat
Epdfview maybe a good choice: http://trac.emma-soft.com/epdfview/ On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:15, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: Hello,  i'm not sure how to get the xpdf to print pdf  documents in user firendly ( aka menu driven ) way. So i looked into alternative. My attempt to get MUPDF

RE: Multiple Routes

2012-01-30 Thread Howard, Chris
That netmask on the 10.1.0.0 are you sure that covers 10.1.16.x ? I'm not sure the leftmost 19 bytes does the job. But you are doing stuff that I've never done. From: Jeremy Wellner [mailto:jwell...@stanwood.wednet.edu] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:23 PM To:

Re: Multiple Routes

2012-01-30 Thread Jeremy Wellner
Pretty sure it does. We've gotten our Mac 10.6 servers connected with similar settings. Address: 10.1.0.0 1010.0001.000 0. Netmask: 255.255.224.0 = 19..111 0. Wildcard: 0.0.31.255..000

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Kevin Wood
You can try Foxit Reader... http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/desklinux/download.html From: Andrew Z form...@gmail.com To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:15 PM Subject: (XFCE) PDF viewer Hello,  i'm not sure how to get the

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Mored Lopes Berdat
Does Foxit Reader have a 64bit version? On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 18:43, Kevin Wood kevin_v_w...@yahoo.com wrote: You can try Foxit Reader... http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/desklinux/download.html From: Andrew Z form...@gmail.com To:

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Andrew Z
doesn't look like it does. But i just recompiled the epdfview from src package i found herehttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/17374860/dir/fedora_16/com/epdfview-0.1.8-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm.html. and it looks very good. thank you all! Andrew On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Mored Lopes

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Mored Lopes Berdat
Your're welcome, enjoy your reading. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 19:18, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: -- OT now i can finally print out the insurance card and avoid getting $200 fee :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: doesn't look like it does. But i

Re: (XFCE) PDF viewer

2012-01-30 Thread Andrew Z
-- OT now i can finally print out the insurance card and avoid getting $200 fee :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Andrew Z form...@gmail.com wrote: doesn't look like it does. But i just recompiled the epdfview from src package i found

RE: Multiple Routes

2012-01-30 Thread Howard, Chris
Ok, I'm convinced. Sorry to put you through that. Beautifully displayed, BTW. From: Jeremy Wellner [mailto:jwell...@stanwood.wednet.edu] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:44 PM To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov Subject: Re: Multiple Routes Pretty sure it does. We've gotten our Mac 10.6

Re: Multiple Routes

2012-01-30 Thread Jeremy Wellner
Oh no worries :) Just a copy paste from the subnet calculator site. :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Howard, Chris howa...@prpa.org wrote: Ok, I’m convinced. Sorry to put you through that. Beautifully displayed, BTW. ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* Jeremy Wellner

serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Yasha Karant
We had a massive power failure, beyond what the UPS could handle. Despite attempts to find a way for the system to shut down gracefully, it simply powered down without unmounting the disk partitions. Nominally, the backup local UPS I am using (APC Back-UPS 650) has an interface Port DB-9

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Connie Sieh
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Yasha Karant wrote: We had a massive power failure, beyond what the UPS could handle. Despite attempts to find a way for the system to shut down gracefully, it simply powered down without unmounting the disk partitions. Nominally, the backup local UPS I am using (APC

Re: why wine 64 pulls tons of 686 deps

2012-01-30 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Andrew Z wrote: i was thinking of installing Teamviwer, but it seemed to require either tons of 86 libs to satisfy it's rpm's dependecies or wine. -snip- I'm curious why would it need 686 deps? Because even the 64bit Windows provides 32bit compatibility, people expect

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Yasha Karant wrote: We had a massive power failure, beyond what the UPS could handle. Despite attempts to find a way for the system to shut down gracefully, it simply powered down without unmounting the disk partitions. Nominally, the backup local UPS I am using (APC

Re: Multiple Routes

2012-01-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 01/30/2012 01:22 PM, Jeremy Wellner wrote: Hi Guys! I'm having a problem getting a new box happy with network routing. This box is used to stage backups before writing to tape and is living on our 172 and our 10.1 storage network. The 172 has a default gateway, the 10.1 doesn't since it's

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Yasha Karant
Hi Dag, Please see my responses below. Thanks, Yasha On 01/30/2012 03:35 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Yasha Karant wrote: We had a massive power failure, beyond what the UPS could handle. Despite attempts to find a way for the system to shut down gracefully, it simply powered

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Yasha Karant wrote: On 01/30/2012 03:35 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: I wonder: - whether you were in fact using a journalling filesystem (because it should even recover from power failure like that when it is journalled) For the most part, for a number of reasons, we are

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Yasha Karant wrote: On 01/30/2012 03:35 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:  I wonder:  - whether you were in fact using a journalling filesystem (because it  should even recover from power failure like that when it

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Dag Wieers
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Ok, I now see what you mean. It is rather confusing to refer as the filesystem having problems is /mnt/sysimage, while that is not the location where it normally is mounted. If you would have mentioned it was your root filesystem, that would have

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Phil Perry
On 30/01/12 22:39, Yasha Karant wrote: We had a massive power failure, beyond what the UPS could handle. Despite attempts to find a way for the system to shut down gracefully, it simply powered down without unmounting the disk partitions. Nominally, the backup local UPS I am using (APC Back-UPS

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Yasha Karant
On 01/30/2012 06:20 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: [snip] I know, that is why I was confused. Why would anyone refer to the /mnt/sysimage filesystem, while in fact it was the root filesystem (and it was even corrupt!). [snip] I was using imprecise language. More precise language would be the file

Re: serious bug in boot sequence when fsck is required

2012-01-30 Thread Sergio Ballestrero
On 30 Jan 2012, at 23:39, Yasha Karant wrote: Upon boot, automatic fsck failed, and a request was posted for root password. However, no more than one character of the password would be accepted, causing an endless loop to this condition and not allowing me control of the system (run fsck