On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> I have been discussing the failure mode that I have observed:
>
> also documented in
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
>
> after fsck fails during a (re)boot
>
> Give root password for maintenance
> (or type Control-D to co
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:47 PM, James M Pulver wrote:
> We've got a Brother MFC-j5910 which is working great networked via the
> brother LPD and CUPS driver, except if you want to print 11x17 / Tabloid. The
> printer for some reason doesn't support that, and instead supports the less
> common 1
So now I think I've managed to get the PPD edited so Tabloid prints from Linux
CUPS clients. However, the PPD update doesn't seem to get copied to the Windows
side via cupsaddsmbd ... the Windows users still don't get a Tabloid (or really
many of the PPD page size options) in their GUI. I can wo
On 02/02/2012 11:33 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi
I've just installed SL6.2RC1 as a KVM guest on a SL6.1 host. Yum updates done
on both.
When I start a terminal I find that the Ctrl keys are ignored, e.g. doing
Ctrl-C just gives a lower case c.
Is this an issue for anyone installing SL6.2RC1 as a
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 11:33 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> I've just installed SL6.2RC1 as a KVM guest on a SL6.1 host. Yum updates
>> done on both.
>> When I start a terminal I find that the Ctrl keys are ignored, e.g. doing
>> Ctrl-C just gives
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
> >
That bug report is no good as it is filed against Fedora. If you want to see
the same bug fixed in RHEL/SL, you better file a bug against RHEL (with
reference
to the fedora bug).
Hi, guys - my SL 6.1 repo files do not seem to have a reference
to the SL debuginfo repository. I looked at the SL FTP server
and I see the debuginfo files here:
http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.1/archive/debuginfo/
Is that the right stuff? Is there any particular reason why ther
On 02/03/2012 11:43 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Hi, guys - my SL 6.1 repo files do not seem to have a reference
to the SL debuginfo repository. I looked at the SL FTP server
and I see the debuginfo files here:
http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.1/archive/debuginfo/
Is that th
On 02/03/2012 08:46 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
That bug report is no good as it is filed against Fedora. If you want to see
the same bug fixed in RHEL/SL, you better file a bug agains
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
>
> Geeky 2011-06-04 09:02:40 EDT
>
> Also present in RHEL6.1 ! paid, licensed, commercial support
>
> End quote. If necessary, to satisfy the poster, I suppose that the report
> can also be
I have been looking into the issue of upstart. From:
http://upstart.ubuntu.com/
Upstart is an event-based replacement for the /sbin/init daemon which
handles starting of tasks and services during boot, stopping them during
shutdown and supervising them while the system is running.
and is th
FYI, unless you have a freshly installed SL6.1 machine, it is likely
that you will not receive email from mdadm when your array fails. This
is because mdadm is not runing. It looks like it always crashes
on startup unless all md arrays have metadata version 1.0 or later -
there is a version number
On 3 February 2012 19:08, Yasha Karant wrote:
> I have been looking into the issue of upstart. From:
>
> http://upstart.ubuntu.com/
>
> Upstart is an event-based replacement for the /sbin/init daemon which
> handles starting of tasks and services during boot, stopping them during
> shutdown and s
On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:08 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
have been looking into the issue of upstart. From:
http://upstart.ubuntu.com/
Upstart is an event-based replacement for the /sbin/init daemon which handles
starting of tasks and services during boot, stopping them during shutdown and
supervisin
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
>
> I have been looking into the issue of upstart. From:
>
> http://upstart.ubuntu.com/
>
> Copyright © 2010 Canonical Ltd. Upstart is a trademark of Canonical Ltd.
>
> which date indicates that the above list may be obsolete, and probably is
> o
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:04 PM, jdow wrote:
> On 2012/02/01 15:38, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
>>>
Back to my primary point: the bug in accepting the root password upon a
fai
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Konstantin Olchanski
wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
>
> That bug report is no good as it is filed against Fedora. If you want to see
> the same bug fixed in RHEL/SL, you be
-Original message-
From: Akemi Yagi
Sent: Sat 04-02-2012 03:04
Subject:Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Keyboard issue with SL6.2RC1
To: Pat Riehecky ;
CC: Bill Maidment ;
SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@listserv.fnal.gov;
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
To verify whether this is a hardware or configuration problem on my
side, do SL 6.2 guests on SL 6.2 hosts work reliably without virtio-net
hiccups for other people?
Even when they are stressed with a bit of network traffic? (~100 GB/hour)
Any reports are highly appreciated.
Origin
Hello,
i'm not sure what i changed ( as far as i remember - nothing), but since
about 3 days ago, the lower panel ( panel 2) started dissappearing from the
screen upon startup. In order to get it back i had to un-check " Show and
hide panel" in panel preferences. that would make it appear . Subse
Dne 4.2.2012 3:34, Benjamin Reiter, Aginion IT-Consulting napsal(a):
To verify whether this is a hardware or configuration problem on my
side, do SL 6.2 guests on SL 6.2 hosts work reliably without virtio-net
hiccups for other people?
Even when they are stressed with a bit of network traffic? (~
On 02/03/2012 02:43 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:04 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/02/01 15:38, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Yasha Karantwrote:
Back to my primary point: the bug in accepting the root pas
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:22:39PM -0800, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >
> >http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1202&L=scientific-linux-users&T=0&P=243
>
> [With rd_NO_PLYMOUTH ... no ... prompt for the password for the root
> filesystem encryption ...]
>
> Not having a prompt for the password
23 matches
Mail list logo
