We would like to install SL on a special-purpose board computer
(VMIVME-7805), but it invariably locks up (with loss of video) when
booting up at around the point where the display is activated, including
in single-user mode. We have tried a variety of Fedora-based
distributions with the same r
W dniu Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:02:49 -0400
Marlin Whitaker napisał(a):
> We would like to install SL on a special-purpose board
> computer (VMIVME-7805), but it invariably locks up (with loss
> of video) when booting up at around the point where the
> display is activated, including in single-user mo
Greetings,
I want to report a possible bug that I've noticed in the past few
days. It seems the "selinux" kickstart option is not honored by
anaconda in SL 6.2. My kickstart file contains:
selinux --disabled
Yet after install, I notice that /etc/sysconfig/selinux still contains:
SELINUX=
On 03/15/2012 08:09 AM, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
W dniu Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:02:49 -0400
Marlin Whitaker napisał(a):
We would like to install SL on a special-purpose board
computer (VMIVME-7805), but it invariably locks up (with loss
of video) when booting up at around the point where the
displ
On 03/15/2012 10:49 AM, Branden Timm wrote:
Greetings,
I want to report a possible bug that I've noticed in the past few
days. It seems the "selinux" kickstart option is not honored by
anaconda in SL 6.2. My kickstart file contains:
selinux --disabled
Yet after install, I notice that /et
Hi,
Am using Java 7u2 32btis, on SL 5.5 and need apply the tzupdate 2012.
My Apps don't work with Ice Tea Open Java, and need run with Oracle Java.
How I can update the TZ tables on Java, with out the official Patch
tzdata2012b, and the TZUpdate tool 1.3.46
Any idea??
--
Pablo Cavero
System En
Hello!
It appears to me that Red Hat Bug #639280 [1] against Fedora 14 appears also
in Scientific Linux 6.2: E.g. in Guake $TERM is "dumb" instead of "xterm". Can
someone confirm this? Is this also a bug in RHEL 6.2? Where should I report
it, so it can be fixed soon?
Kind regards,
Dennis
[1]
On 15 March 2012 17:27, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Hello!
>
> It appears to me that Red Hat Bug #639280 [1] against Fedora 14 appears also
> in Scientific Linux 6.2: E.g. in Guake $TERM is "dumb" instead of "xterm". Can
> someone confirm this? Is this also a bug in RHEL 6.2? Where should I report
>
On 03/15/2012 10:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hello!
It appears to me that Red Hat Bug #639280 [1] against Fedora 14 appears also
in Scientific Linux 6.2: E.g. in Guake $TERM is "dumb" instead of "xterm". Can
someone confirm this? Is this also a bug in RHEL 6.2? Where should I report
it, so it
We're seeing these errors on 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 as seen in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790729 with NetApp filers
and it is making large maildir spools on our IMAP servers a bit (read a
lot) unhappy. Is anyone else having this problem?
--
Kelsey Cummings - k...@corp.sonic.n
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
We're seeing these errors on 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 as seen in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790729 with NetApp filers
and it is making large maildir spools on our IMAP servers a bit (read a
lot) unhappy. Is anyone else having this pr
On 3/15/2012 12:18 PM, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
>
>> We're seeing these errors on 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 as seen in
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790729 with NetApp filers
>> and it is making large maildir spools on our IMAP servers a b
Hi Todd And Margo Chester!
On 2012.03.15 at 11:34:59 -0700, Todd And Margo Chester wrote next:
> On 03/15/2012 10:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> >Hello!
> >
> >It appears to me that Red Hat Bug #639280 [1] against Fedora 14 appears also
> >in Scientific Linux 6.2: E.g. in Guake $TERM is "dumb"
On 03/15/2012 07:39 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I hate being such a PITR, but have to ask: Is there an ETA for those
> updates? What's the problem? Yes it's 3.x -> 10.x, but it has been obvious
> for weeks that this would happen eventually. CentOS got those out 24h ago.
> Wha
On 03/15/2012 02:57 PM, g wrote:
On 03/15/2012 07:39 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
Dear developers,
I hate being such a PITR, but have to ask: Is there an ETA for those
updates? What's the problem? Yes it's 3.x -> 10.x, but it has been obvious
for weeks that this would happen eventually. CentOS
15 matches
Mail list logo
