On Apr 6, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Stable IP address assignments are important for any SSH or SSL based access.
> OpenSSH, in particular, doesn't have useful behavior if the IP addresses swap
> and you have old public host keys stored locally.
SSL doesn't care about IP, o
On 04/07/2012 11:19 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Stable IP address assignments are important for any SSH or SSL based
access. OpenSSH, in particular, doesn't have useful behavior if the IP
addresses swap and you have old public host keys stored locally.
Now that you mention it, every permanent
On 04/07/2012 08:51 AM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
Just thought I'd toss out another perspective -- it works for us quite
well, and surely there are better methods we could apply too, but that's
for another day.
Regards,
chris
Chris,
Very interesting. I've never used DHCP for anything other than g
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Joel Maslak wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:23 PM, zxq9 wrote:
>
> > Do you mean there are serious networks that use DHCP by default for
> systems other than transient network guests residing in their own little
> subnet (like laptops)? And server IP assignment by D
On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:23 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> Do you mean there are serious networks that use DHCP by default for systems
> other than transient network guests residing in their own little subnet (like
> laptops)? And server IP assignment by DHCP... I can't believe this is really
> done, or am I b
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:23 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> On 04/07/2012 03:28 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
>> I tend to think that these days one should go back to static IP addresses
>> for server-type machines, after all, all DHCP, network manager& co do is
>> assign
>> the same IP address to the sam
On 04/06/2012 06:23 PM, zxq9 wrote:
On 04/07/2012 03:28 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
I tend to think that these days one should go back to static IP addresses
for server-type machines, after all, all DHCP, network manager& co do is
assign
the same IP address to the same machine over and ov
On 04/07/2012 01:12 AM, Devin Bougie wrote:
Hi, All. We're seeing a problem running opengl on a remote SL6
system when the local system uses the proprietary nvidia drivers. > This does
not seem to be a problem with remote SL5 systems.
The problem seems to only be when sitting at a local syste
On 04/07/2012 03:28 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
I tend to think that these days one should go back to static IP addresses
for server-type machines, after all, all DHCP, network manager& co do is assign
the same IP address to the same machine over and over and over again with the
only
variat
Hello Ken,
please take a look at this article.
http://kb.iu.edu/data/bbsr.html
-Tam
On 03/30/2012 09:19 AM, Christopher Tooley wrote:
I have also set up windows 8 preview in a VirtualBox environment, and it
works just fine (my host is not super fast though, so the vm was pretty
slow). Very interesting and, to me, compelling, interface; I'm wondering
how easily the average user w
TUV needs an option in kickstart to turn off NM for designated cards. Btw,
NM_CONTROLLED="no" in ifcfg-eth0 is not sufficient. When you do this, I lose
DNS as well since apparently, NetworkManager usurps dhcp-client's role in this. When I
chkconfig NetworkManager off, everything works.
So I
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:46:50PM -0500, Ken Teh wrote:
> Is it true that the network manager service turns off the network when there
> is no activity?
Think of it this way.
The network manager was invented to handle Wifi on laptops. (And it works well
enough for that).
When used for any oth
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:47:45AM -0700, Wil Irwin wrote:
>
> ... Submitting a job in each terminal window will send it to a core which is
> not being used.
>
I sense a deep conceptual misunderstanding.
In traditional time shared multiprocessing systems, such as Linux or WinNT,
you do not "sen
On 04/07/2012 01:51 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 04/06/2012 12:15 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
I haven't yet installed SL6, but I have installed SL5 on a PC from the
PC's disk, after what could go on a DVD is instead on a partition
that's to be left alone by installation. That
On 04/06/2012 12:15 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
I haven't yet installed SL6, but I have installed SL5 on a PC from
the PC's disk, after what could go on a DVD is instead on a partition
that's to be left alone by installation. That should also be an
alternative for SL6.
Steven Yellin
On
I haven't yet installed SL6, but I have installed SL5 on a PC from the
PC's disk, after what could go on a DVD is instead on a partition that's
to be left alone by installation. That should also be an alternative for
SL6.
Steven Yellin
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, US
Hi, All. We're seeing a problem running opengl on a remote SL6 system when the
local system uses the proprietary nvidia drivers. This does not seem to be a
problem with remote SL5 systems.
The problem seems to only be when sitting at a local system with the nvidia
drivers (tested with local S
This works for me onto a 4g flash drive. Obviously adjust architecture
and device names to suit your situation.
wget
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/scientific-linux/6x/x86_64/iso/SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-16-LiveDVD.iso
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=100
sudo dd if=SL-62-x86_64-2012-02-16-L
Can someone explain what the problem is here? I really don't
care about creating a live Linux on a flash drive, just want to
install without burning a DVD but nothing I have tried so far
has met with success. I am open to suggestions.
Bob
[bobg@box7 ~]$
20 matches
Mail list logo
