Hi Orion Poplawski!
On 2012.07.17 at 16:46:19 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote next:
> >That depends heavily on what version of Fedora they are (particularly Rawhide
> >instances), and what services they are running.
>
> Well, I have a Fedora 17 instance running now with nothing but
> kernel proces
Hi Orion Poplawski!
On 2012.07.17 at 13:38:50 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote next:
> > If your atop service is on, you should be able to see something about
> >what was happening shortly before the crash by viewing the appropriate
> >/var/log/atop/ with the atop -r command.
> > You could
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William Lutter wrote:
Wouldn't you know it, I just rebooted my SL6.0 or 6.1 linux PC prior to leaving
town for a week and it hangs on all 3 of the available kernels.
I see a black screen with white letters "Scientific Linux 6."
I've not tried start up options. No problem
Malcolm,
Which rpm's worked for you?
I have sshd running so I've been able to survive but none of the
suggestions so far let me log in from the console on my VM.
thanks
Joe
On 07/17/2012 01:41 AM, Malcolm MacCallum wrote:
I have solved my problem by downloading the relevant rpm files to my
Wi
On 07/18/2012 07:46 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/17/2012 04:17 PM, zxq9 wrote:
On 07/18/2012 06:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
While staring at top on my kvm server waiting for it to crash, I noticed
that my idle Fedora kvm guests appear to be consuming between 8-12% cpu
while my idle SL6 gu
On 07/17/2012 04:17 PM, zxq9 wrote:
On 07/18/2012 06:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
While staring at top on my kvm server waiting for it to crash, I noticed
that my idle Fedora kvm guests appear to be consuming between 8-12% cpu
while my idle SL6 guests appear to be consuming between 0.3-2% cpu a
On 07/18/2012 06:55 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
While staring at top on my kvm server waiting for it to crash, I noticed
that my idle Fedora kvm guests appear to be consuming between 8-12% cpu
while my idle SL6 guests appear to be consuming between 0.3-2% cpu as
shown in the qemu-kvm processes in
While staring at top on my kvm server waiting for it to crash, I noticed that
my idle Fedora kvm guests appear to be consuming between 8-12% cpu while my
idle SL6 guests appear to be consuming between 0.3-2% cpu as shown in the
qemu-kvm processes in top.
Does anyone have any insight as to why
On 07/18/2012 06:22 AM, William Lutter wrote:
Wouldn't you know it, I just rebooted my SL6.0 or 6.1 linux PC prior to leaving
town for a week and it hangs on all 3 of the available kernels.
I see a black screen with white letters "Scientific Linux 6."
I've not tried start up options. No proble
Wouldn't you know it, I just rebooted my SL6.0 or 6.1 linux PC prior to leaving
town for a week and it hangs on all 3 of the available kernels.
I see a black screen with white letters "Scientific Linux 6."
I've not tried start up options. No problem with this PC. I did have a matlab
issue usi
On 07/17/2012 11:46 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
On Jul 17, 2012, at 19:22 , Orion Poplawski wrote:
Our SL6.2 KVM and nfs/backup server has been crashing frequently recently
(starting around Fri 13th - yikes!) with Kernel panic - Out of memory and no
killable processes. The server has 48GB ram
On 07/17/2012 12:21 PM, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
If your atop service is on, you should be able to see something about
what was happening shortly before the crash by viewing the appropriate
/var/log/atop/ with the atop -r command.
You could just try increasing your swap space; you don't
If your atop service is on, you should be able to see something about
what was happening shortly before the crash by viewing the appropriate
/var/log/atop/ with the atop -r command.
You could just try increasing your swap space; you don't have very
much compared with your ram. Simple '
On Jul 17, 2012, at 19:22 , Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Our SL6.2 KVM and nfs/backup server has been crashing frequently recently
> (starting around Fri 13th - yikes!) with Kernel panic - Out of memory and no
> killable processes. The server has 48GB ram, 2GB swap, only about 15GB
> dedicated to
Our SL6.2 KVM and nfs/backup server has been crashing frequently recently
(starting around Fri 13th - yikes!) with Kernel panic - Out of memory and no
killable processes. The server has 48GB ram, 2GB swap, only about 15GB
dedicated to VM guests. I've tried bumping up vm.min_free_kbytes to 2621
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:01:22AM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
> *SL_enable_serialconsole-1152-4.1-1.el6
> ...
> -removed support for non-grub bootloaders as none are available for SL6
>
To nit-pick the wording, of course there are non-grub bootloaders available for
SL6.
syslinux/extlinux/p
FYI.
This is from the "centos" list.
-Connie Sieh
From: Alexander Dalloz
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] attention: sudo update breaks nsswitch
Hi,
please be aware of a problem caused by yesterday's sudo u
Since there has been interest in the release of SL 6.3 I am forwarding
this testing anouncment which normally only goes to scientific-linux-devel
.
-Connie Sieh
-
Scientific Linux 6.3 Beta 1 i386/x86_64
On 4 July 2012 03:11, Duke wrote:
> On 7/2/12 9:55 AM, William Scott wrote:
>>
>>
>> What is the device being used as a router at 192.168.0.1?
>>
>
> It is a Windows Server (2003) with DHCP server enabled.
>
I believe you now have a double nat'ed setup.
If I was doing this I would try to get the
On 07/17/2012 05:41 PM, Malcolm MacCallum wrote:
I could boot up to the screen saying 'Scientific Linux 6' and then get a shell
(by CTRL-ALT-F2) and log in. Thus I got to runlevel 3 with no network
connection.
My problem was how to then get to a state where I could run yum with remote
repos.
I
I could boot up to the screen saying 'Scientific Linux 6' and then get a shell
(by CTRL-ALT-F2) and log in. Thus I got to runlevel 3 with no network
connection.
My problem was how to then get to a state where I could run yum with remote
repos.
I have solved my problem by downloading the relevant
21 matches
Mail list logo
