Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Henrique Junior wrote: I've created some ntop (5.0-2) RPMs for EL6[1] and I have plans to submit it to RPMForge, but, before I do so, I'd like$ I'd love if the network administration guys here could give it a try and send me some feedback. From: Federico Alves

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Volker I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain ntop in EPEL6 is that Fedora now uses systemd to manage our

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-14 Thread Chris Schanzle
On 09/14/2012 03:58 AM, Winnie Lacesso wrote: Server has 16GB RAM 20GB swap; problem is, it's a compute server used by many. So one user (later mortified remorseful, but) causes grief for many. And a forced reset is always a concern re: possible filesystem corruption. Thank you all very much

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Volker Fröhlich
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 06:42 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Volker I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Henrique Junior
As far as I know, Fedora is not going to accept more than one spec file to a single package (I'm going to ask). I'm in contact with Rakesh Pandit, the guy who takes care of ntop in Fedora and seeing if we can put it to work for EPEL6   -- Henrique LonelySpooky Junior

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-14 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Sep 13, 2012, at 18:59 , Chris Schanzle wrote: In our experience, if memory is allocated and never touched, it's like you never allocated it at all (with respect to swap). Allocated but untouched pages will not be swapped. Right, but they do count as committed. Thus, once

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 16:20 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote: I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain ntop in EPEL6 is that Fedora

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote: I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain ntop

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Henrique Junior
Here is the answer from the team: The fedora build setup has git branches for each release EL-5, EL-6, F17, F19, Master, so there is no problem to have different .SPEC files for each branch and And is perfectly fine to have conditionals as well: From now I'll team up with Rakesh to get ntop in

Re: ntop for EL6

2012-09-14 Thread Volker Froehlich
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 08:30 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote: Here is the answer from the team: The fedora build setup has git branches for each release EL-5, EL-6, F17, F19, Master, so there is no problem to have different .SPEC files for each branch and And is perfectly fine to have