Do you mean adjtime by any chance? Unfortunately the values in its
fields do not seem to be well defined. It is part of the initscripts
package.
{^_^}
On 2012/10/02 22:09, g wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the
On 10/03/2012 06:45 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/10/02 22:09, g wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the 'tick rate' for the system clock.
is such a file used in scientific linux and what is it's name?
tia.
Do you
On 2012/10/03 01:33, g wrote:
On 10/03/2012 06:45 AM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/10/02 22:09, g wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the 'tick rate' for the system clock.
is such a file used in scientific linux and what is
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 04:28:22PM +0200, Gerhard Schneider wrote:
After upgrading to 6.3 we were seeing autofs segfaulting on many machines.
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
First busted NIS (no
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:00:00AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 04:28:22PM +0200, Gerhard Schneider wrote:
After upgrading to 6.3 we were seeing autofs segfaulting on many machines.
Something
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:02 AM, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2012/10/03 01:33, g wrote:
as stated in orig post, it was used as a _factor_to_adjust_ the
'tick rate'. no speed up or slow down as 'adj-time' does.
I have the impression that Linux tends to be tickless and adjusts
itself to
On 09/29/2012 10:28 AM, Gerhard Schneider wrote:
After upgrading to 6.3 we were seeing autofs segfaulting on many machines.
A bug fix can be downloaded via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
Only as an information if someone is needing it - it seems that we have
to wait very
Yea but to be clear that's non a dynamic value it has to be configured when
the kernel is compiled.
Some unix flavors had that option due to odd differences between different
versions of their own home grown hardware. That really is an unusual thing
to adjust now unless you are running on some
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:38:23PM -0400, Chris Schanzle wrote:
On 09/29/2012 10:28 AM, Gerhard Schneider wrote:
A bug fix can be downloaded via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846852
I am not authorized to access that bug, even with a freebie account - can
someone
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:09 AM, g gel...@bellsouth.net wrote:
greetings.
in unix, there is a file, name of which i do not recall, used as a
'clock factor' and controls the 'tick rate' for the system clock.
I assume you mean what' in the the NTP system, in the xntp or ntp
packages, and it's
Well if I'm right he's talking about either adjusting to a nonstandard tick
source which happens either with a nonstandart cpu, bios chip, or an atomic
clock. If its a teir 1 (atomic clock) source the ntp documentaion covers
this but if its a nonstandard cpu that's an other thing. However ther is
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, David Sommerseth
sl+us...@lists.topphemmelig.net wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Areeda newsre...@areeda.com
To: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
Cc: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Sent: Tuesday, 2 October, 2012 10:51:52
12 matches
Mail list logo
