Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Rosmond
Bonnie, That what I needed! I typically use 'Yum extended' for my package management, so have become deficient with the command line. I had the x86_64 adobe repository enabled, but had to tell Yum specifically what I wanted. Thanks again. T. Rosmond On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 15:02 -0500, Bonnie

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Doug Johnson
Greetings, If you have adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm installed, you should have something like the following in /etc/yum.repo.d/adobe-linux-x86_64.repo: [adobe-linux-x86_64] name=Adobe Systems Incorporated baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/x86_64/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=fi

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Bonnie King
I am a little confused. I already have adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm installed on my system because I have the adobe repository enabled.But I only have the i386 flash-player installed, because SL 5.5 apparently didn't support the x86_64 player yet and depended on nspluginwrapper. A

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Valery Mitsyn
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Tom Rosmond wrote: Bonnie, Thanks again. As I mentioned yesterday, removing 'nspluginwrapper' fixed the problem. Interesting, however, is that with my x86_64 SL 5.5 only the i386 flash-plugin is installed and available via YUM. In the spirit of 'if it ain't broke, don't f

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Rosmond
Doug, I am a little confused. I already have adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm installed on my system because I have the adobe repository enabled. But I only have the i386 flash-player installed, because SL 5.5 apparently didn't support the x86_64 player yet and depended on nspluginwrappe

Re: resize virtual disk partition

2012-11-02 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Oct 30, 2012, at 00:50 , Gerald Waugh wrote: > Stephan Wiesand wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2012, at 23:05 , Gerald Waugh wrote: > >> I need to resize /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_home disk size was increased but >> the partition I still small >> Not sure if it can be resized without damage, I assume th

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Doug Johnson
Greetings, The following should work: Remove all traces of nspluginwrapper from your 64 bit machine(s). Then go to the Adobe website, and download and then install: adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm After that, you can install Flash x64 from Adobe. Hope this helps,

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Rosmond
Bonnie, I stand corrected. I just tried a website that asked for the flash-plugin (x86_64). That creates a dilemma; SL 5.5 doesn't have the x86_64 flash-plugin, but depends on nspluginwrapper for 64-bit support. I guess one recourse is to try do downgrade firefox to the previous version that wor

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Tom Rosmond
Bonnie, Thanks again. As I mentioned yesterday, removing 'nspluginwrapper' fixed the problem. Interesting, however, is that with my x86_64 SL 5.5 only the i386 flash-plugin is installed and available via YUM. In the spirit of 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it', I think I will leave it that way.

Re: firefox segmentation fault after update

2012-11-02 Thread Bonnie King
Thanks Tom, I've tested and I'm able to reproduce the crash on x86_64 with: * firefox.x86_64 0:10.0.10-1.el5_8 * flash-plugin-11.2.202.243-release.i386 or flash-plugin-11.2.202.243-release.x86_64, * nspluginwrapper installed No segfault with flash-plugin-11.2.202.243-release.x86_64 without n