Yasha Karant writes:
> On 01/30/2015 10:32 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
>
> The application, say A, runs under environment (OS) X, not environment
> Y. One wants A under Y. The target is Y. Can one build A under Y
> using the appropriate "chunks"
> from X with Docker, or does one re-build ("dockeris
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:32 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
Yasha Karant writes:
For example, will a
legally licensed MS Win application that does not run under
Wine/CrossOver work under Docker under SL 7 the same as it would under
VirtualBox with a full install of sa
On 02/02/2015 11:35 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:32 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
Yasha Karant writes:
For example, will a
legally licensed MS Win application that does not run under
Wine/CrossOver work under Docker under SL 7 the same as it wou
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 02/02/2015 11:35 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:32 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
Yasha Karant writes:
For example, will a
legally licensed MS Win application that does not run under
Wine/CrossOver work
Yasha writes;
> Please correct me if I am in error. RHEL, binary licensed for fee, is built
> from a source that RH does not seem to release.
You've already got it backwards: Red Hat publishes as much as possible
as open source, preferably even freeware, and has been a champion if
turning clos
