Le 23 février 2016 18:19:26 CET, Stephan Wiesand a
écrit :
>Hi Dirk,
>
>a bit late, but...
>
>On Feb 10, 2016, at 22:05 , Dirk Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> Dear co-users,
>>
>> Can anyone reproduce the following error on SL7.1?
>>
>> $ sudo yum install iptables-services
>>
Ah, I should have thought of that. Thanks. All good now.
Just stepping into the 7.x release and there's a lot going on.
Dan
On Tue 23.Feb.16 12:15, Pat Riehecky wrote:
*** WARNING ***
EXTERNAL EMAIL -- This message originates from outside our organization.
Can I have you run a 'yum clean
Can I have you run a 'yum clean all' for me?
I show ver 0.5.5-1 in the 7.2 public tree:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7.2/x86_64/os/repoview/device-mapper-persistent-data.html
Pat
On 02/23/2016 11:54 AM, Dan McDaniel wrote:
After a fresh install of 7.2 I get dependency
After a fresh install of 7.2 I get dependency problems when doing a yum
update.
Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-21.el7_2.x86_64 (sl-fastbugs)
Requires: gcc = 4.8.5
Installed: gcc-4.8.3-9.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda/7.2)
gcc = 4.8.2-16.el7
gcc = 4.8.3-9.el7
Hi Dirk,
a bit late, but...
On Feb 10, 2016, at 22:05 , Dirk Hoffmann wrote:
> Dear co-users,
>
> Can anyone reproduce the following error on SL7.1?
>
> $ sudo yum install iptables-services
> [...]
> Downloading packages:
> iptables-services-1.4.21-16.el7.x86_64.rpm | 49 kB
On 02/23/2016 03:29 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
Apologies, but I do not understand the "+1"; is this approval to post
additional commentary on this matter, or, again, is this discussion
not suitable for this list? I did not initiate the matter of the ACM
view or curricular recommendations, in
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I actually use an rsync mirror (the copy is done with rsync -avHAX, although
> symlinks can be disturbed if not careful) to another disk; an rsync backup
> is restored quite simply, and using hardlinking can trim quite a bit
Apologies, but I do not understand the "+1"; is this approval to post
additional commentary on this matter, or, again, is this discussion not
suitable for this list? I did not initiate the matter of the ACM view or
curricular recommendations, in contrast to that of an information
technology