On 9/3/07, Urs Beyerle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> > Besides I encountered download problem. My PC is connected to 2MB
> > broadband. At the beginning it download rapidly but the download speed
> > was gradually reduced indicating that it needs >8hr finally. I don't
> > kn
On 9/7/07, W. J. Kossler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 19:15 -0400, W. J. Kossler wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 16:03 -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, W. J. Kossler wrote:
> > ieee80211 version 1.2.18-20.el5
> > ieee80211-kmdl-2.6.18-8.1.3.el5 version 1.2
On 9/18/07, Steve Gaarder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kernel should I be using for a guest OS under SL5's Xen? The kernel
> that works in Domain 0 does not seem to work in other domains.
>
> thanks,
>
> Steve Gaarder
Efforts have been made in the CentOS community to develop kernels
optimize
On 9/18/07, Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed your newly-posted kernel:
>
> kernel-2.6.18-8.1.10.el5.x86_64
> NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-1.0-9742-pkg2.run
> which I downloaded from the nvidia site and installed.
> (it's a beta version, but works well with the older kernel.)
>
> Ho
Sorry, if this is a FAQ or written in an obvious place. I have been
trying to 'log in' on the SL home page but cannot find any "register"
link. Could someone let me know how I can have my login account set
up?
Akemi
On 10/13/07, Rohan Mittal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, can a list of such libraries etc. added to the SL-5 LiveCD be released
> as well. Thanks.
Info in the LiveCD 5.0 can be found here:
https://www.scientificlinux.org/news/livecd-50
Note the ntfs-3g package for NTFS mounting.
Akemi
On 10/15/07, Urs Beyerle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rohan Mittal wrote:
>
> You can install the following rpm on your SL5 system:
> # rpm -ihv
> http://linux.web.psi.ch/dist/scientific/50/psi/all/ntfs-3g-1.913-3.slp5.i386.rpm
>
> To mount for example /dev/sda1 as NTFS filesystem:
> # mkdir -p /mn
On 10/20/07, Miles O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wenji Wu said...
>
> |I want to profile the system with oprofile, which only requires the vmlinux
> |(the uncompressed kernel image). My system has only vlinuz. Are there any
> |way that I can convert vmlinuz to vmlinux?
>
> Some details are he
On 10/22/07, Tadayuki Higashitani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to mount USB drive in SL 5.0 ?
> We cannot get any information for mount at dmesg command.
> In SL 4.4, USB drive is auto mounted.
This wiki page may help:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/HAL
Akemi
On 10/23/07, Wenji Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just because your hardware is capable of doing 64 bit does not mean
> > you
> > installed a 64 bit kernel.
> >
> > What is the output of
> >
> > uname -a
>
> The output of "uname -a" is "2.6.18-8.1.14.el5".
This is not the entire output of a '
On Nov 10, 2007 5:09 PM, Keith Lofstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run SL5 on all my machines except for my offsite virtual server,
> which is running a Xen-ified version of CentOS-5 provided by the
> hosting service. At 0400GMT on November 8, the server yum update
> process downloaded perl-
On Nov 12, 2007 5:50 PM, Fernando Avila Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you think? How far back in time do I have to go to find a
> > version of Gnumeric that can be compiled under SL5?
> >
>
> Usually the best bet is to compile a src.rpm from FC 6.
>
> RHEL 5 (and of
On Nov 18, 2007 1:56 PM, Harold Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Its very true that you lose out on RedHat's support for a recompiled
> kernel, but if you maintain the latest version of the kernel, you should
> get the latest fixes, whatever they may be.
>
> I personally have been using
On Dec 5, 2007 12:35 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would not mind doing that if that is the right thing to do.
>
> Perhaps I had misunderstood the meaning of the markers like "el" or
> "sl" in the version. I had thought that it was supposed to indicate
> the version of linux that
On Dec 11, 2007 2:29 PM, Fernando C. Estrada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I want to install a cluster with SL, if anyone know documentation about
> it, please send me the url.
>
> Thanks!
How about:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Cluster_Suite_Overview/
and
http://www.centos.org/do
(Resending because the earlier one sent to a wrong list)
On Dec 11, 2007 9:12 AM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been building rpms a long time,but never bothered with using
> Mock. Now I need to because some i386 rpms won't build on x86_64
> systems and I'm told in the Fedora lis
On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, James Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just set up a Dell Precision 390 with Scientific Linux 5.0. When
> adding an initial user account, I wasn't thinking and used an all
> numeric user ID, which Scientific Linux rightly complained might be
> confused
On Dec 27, 2007 7:23 AM, Emanuele Leonardi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed SL5 on a file server with pre-existing reiserfs partitio
> ns
> which I want to preserve.
>
> According to the man page, reiserfs is supported by mount but when I give
>
> the command I get the following error:
On Dec 27, 2007 12:56 PM, John Summerfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Dec 27, 2007 7:23 AM, Emanuele Leonardi
> > The upstream's kernel does not have reiserfs enabled. You will need to
> > enable it and recompile the kernel. In make menu
On Jan 5, 2008 2:24 PM, Adrian Sevcenco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi! I need to find the changelog of patches that are applied on RHEL
> (and/or SL) version of openssl and i dont know how to start the search
> (what and where). I am in a situation when it was said to me that a
> certain program
On Jan 21, 2008 12:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I have installed SL5 and then I installed vmpalyer. While configuring
> vmplayer it says that
> "None of the pre-built vmmon modules for VMware Player is suitable for your
> running kernel. Do you want this program to try to build the vm
On Feb 11, 2008 2:18 PM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OS: SL 5.1 x86.
>
> How can one use NTFS partitions automatically, after he boots in SL 5.1
> GNOME? I have installed fuse-ntfs-3g from the dag repository but I don't
> know what must be done after this. Or is the dkms version bet
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 5:43 PM, markaoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
> Is there some special way to setup the kernel source tree when building from
> an rpm?
You can find detailed procedures on the CentOS wiki.
First, here is how to set up the kernel source tree:
http://wiki.centos.org/H
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:35 PM, markaoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> hi,
> I just dl'd & built a kernel source RPM ( 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5-i686 ) as I
> needed to set some kernel
> switches for a new driver.
>
> The rpm build process produced the exact RPMs that I expected, complete with
> my lit
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:21 PM, markaoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, its installed:
>
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-8.1.3.el5.i686 "Development package for developing
> kernel modules to match the kernel".
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-8.1.3.el5.i386 "Header files for the Linux kernel for
> use by glib
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, markaoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it produced ten (10) various *_test.el5.i686.rpms, in the /RPMS/i686
> directory, as expected.
Yes. And one of them is kernel-devel-2.6.18-8.1.3_test.el5.i686.rpm.
You have to *install* it by (after cd to that directory)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rpm install -ivh kernel-devel-2.6.18-8.1.3_test.el5.i686.rpm
Sorry, delete the "install":
rpm -ivh kernel-devel-2.6.18-8.1.3_test.el5.i686.rpm
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm having troubles finding XFS kernel modules for SL5.1. So far, I've
> tried the standard repositories (sl-contrib, sl-base, sl-security) and
> also atrpms and dag, but to no avail. Do we have such modules, or
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:56 AM, markaoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> I have noticed that there is no SMP kernel in the
> repositories. Is this right?
>
> How can I choose between SMP and no SMP kernel during the
> installation?
>
> It seems that the installation picked the SMP versi
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Beyerle Urs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rachid Ayad wrote:
> >
> > Hello, It seems in the skype web site: no skype rpm for SL, so what I
> > should download as linux (fedora ..) for skype?
>
> skype for CentOS 5, if you are using SL5
>
> Urs
This CentOS
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Rachid Ayad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, The web site:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
>
> as Akemi suggested was very useful. I did:
>
> 1) wget http://www.skype.com/go/getskype-linux-beta-centos
> It download an rmp file: skype-2.0.0.43-ce
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Robert E. Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have an asus a8v that is running a recent install of SL5.1 X86_64 (an
> athlon X2 3800+). It has two gigabit ethernet cards which are both
> served by the skge dr
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Chris Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>But how to get these updates onto systems where the old packages are
> > >>already installed (other than manually, with --force)? Do I have to dig
> > >>out my old scripts from the pre yum aera?
>
> > >
> > >You hav
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Michael Mansour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently upgraded some 32bit servers to SL46 (from 45).
>
> All the servers that were upgraded, exhibit this:
>
> # prelink /usr/bin/pstree
> prelink: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfi
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:28 AM, zeng yangyang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings. I use RealTek RTL8111B Gigabit LAN in ASUS P5PL2-E motherboard.
> And SL5.1 can not detect the hardware. I downloaded drivers from RealTek's
> official site, and it didn't work well, Actually, at first it can't be
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Ioannis Vranos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have downloaded SL 5.1 x86 DVD image, and although it passes
> sha1sum test and I burn it verifying it, when I test the medium during
> install it fails. Also installation fails. The same happens with CentOS
> 5.1
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jim McCarthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello --
>
> I recently acquired an HP zx6000 dual Itanium-2 workstation, and so I was
> very pleased to find Scientific Linux (version 4.1) available for the IA-64
> architecture. But according to the SL news archive,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to second Martin's words.
> We originally had Itanium because a lab or two had some Itanium clusters,
> but those went away for whatever reason, and we eventually dropped support
> due to nobody wanting it.
>
>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:06 AM, P. Larry Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote on 4/18/2008 10:52 AM:
>
> > P. Larry Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > Here's what I assume to be a simple grub question
> >
> > OT: please don't click "reply" when you have a question that isn't
> > realted
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Stephan Wiesand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Steven J. Yellin wrote:
>
> >I want a USB device to be available for mounting on a computer right
> after the device is plugged into a running system. I.e., I want USB
> hotplugging. It works on
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Niels Walet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you real want it, google for "vacation centos5"--I think the karan
> repository has a version of it.
> Niels
I don't really find it there...
Akemi
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Ken Teh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a clever fool-proof way of deselecting the SMP kernel. I've
> just installed SL 4.6 under Mac Parallels for a colleague. It doesn't boot
> with the SMP kernel; only the UP kernel. So, I selected the appropriate
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually after I sent that and tried to look ... I cannot find any of their
> packages from yesterday. Which is odd. They usually beat us on pushing
> stuff out.
> Troy
Because of 5.2? Updates/fixes for 5.2 might not be
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually after I sent that and tried to look ... I cannot find any of
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Jan Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently upgraded a number of NFS clients from SL 4.2 to SL 5.1. The
> NFS server is still running SL 4.2. Clients are acting very slow, e.g.
>
> - after SSH authentication, it takes about 5 sec. for the console
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Jan Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for all your replies. The problem was caused by the mentioned
> kernel bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321111).
>
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> This is a know
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Miles O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking through things it appears this was an issue
> with some EL4 kernels as well. Does anyone know
> in which EL4 release this showed up?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miles
>
If you are referring to the NFS problem discussed in an e
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Clark wrote:
> I have just verified that on a standard RHEL 4 machine, with no Scientific
> Linux stuff, that this same problem is happening. So this is clearly
> upstream. I am looking for a bugzilla report right now.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I guess I am the first to see this, and of course, I saw it after I pushed
> out the errata. It looks like nspluginwrapper is very sensitive about what
> version of firefox, or xulrunner, you have installed.
> Ther
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Avetisyan, Aram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the past couple of weeks, I have been trying to get my Intel 4965AGN card
> working on SL5.1 (kernel 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5). Today I noticed that the driver
> responsible for it, iwl4965, is blacklisted in /etc/
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Avetisyan, Aram
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Akemi,
>
> Unfortunately, it does not work out of the box in SL5.1. It initially worked
> about half the time with "alias wlan0 iwl4965" added to modprobe.conf, but
> after the latest updates, it doesn't work at all.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Miles O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's fine until you start using a different version of
> a package than the vendor uses. Maybe there's a way around
> that in yum; I haven't really figured yum out yet. Is there
> a *good* doc on yum out there that exp
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Miguel A. Lerma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe in SL 4.x there used to be rpm packages iiimf-* and
> ttfonts-* for inputing and displaying international characters,
> including oriental languages such as Chinese, Japanese, etc.
> I don't see them in SL 5.x
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Gerry Pyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running a SL system that has bind-9.2.5-3 and this seems to be the
> latest that yum will take it to for my version. Is there a patch or further
> update that I can implement to overcome the cache poisoning vulnerability
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Gerry Pyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the mis-info on my last post – The version of bind on my SL 4.0
> box is actually bind-9.2.4-28.0.1.el3.i386 and yum says there are no further
> updates for this. My dns is showing "poor" when I run the test. If I l
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Rachid Ayad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Brian Andrus wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Brian Andrus wrote:
>>>
try unmounting and remounting /tmp
umount /tmp
mount /tmp
>>>
>>> You mean umount /scratch
>>>
check in your /e
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Mark Stodola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rachid Ayad wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Hello Akemi, I think there is a prolem with changin permission,
>> owner,groups in SL: I was doing this all my
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Marcus Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> I tested it on two different servers - one with 2 DualCoreOpterons and one
> with 2 QuadCoreOpterons - but SL fails on both.
> Maybe the output of lspci could help:
It is possible that you need a newer version of lm_sens
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ken Teh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose I could test this if I had a sacrificial machine, but I'm hoping
> someone can simply confirm that it does work. I have a 4.2 server machine
> which was not installed with the gnome desktop. I need to do so now and wa
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Salvador Aguinaga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On this very issue, I installed a system on a Thinkpad X41 with gnome,
> but I want to install XFCE, do I follow the same set of steps? I
> tried "sudo yum groupinstall xfce" and that did not work on SLINUX (on
> fedor
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Salvador Aguinaga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi,
> That's right, thank you.
>
> xfce is not listed as only ice and kde. Do you know what other
> options I should look into? I did download the source code for XFCE,
> but untar'ng the file gave me list of man p
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> Someone must advise here, but if the CentOS extra repository can be
>> used without any compatibility issue, that would be the easiest
>> solution. This extra repo h
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Mark Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run Scientific Linux 5.2 with kernel 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 on a
> Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Si 1520. I have the Intel PRO/Wireless 3945 ABG
> card. I noticed that the original installed configuration came with
> mac80211
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Eve V. E. Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried to fix the ports that nfs uses for its various daemons?
> Supposedly, by setting the environmental variables in/etc/sysconfig/nfs,
> one can fix the ports on which the daemons listen.
>
> All of them wor
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Well, it looks like I'm going to have to put out a version of yum with the
> "versionfix" plugin for SL5. In summary, rpm is picking newer and older
> package names different than I expected.
>
> According to rpm
>
>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:16 AM, suhaiL khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi folks
> i am very new user of SL. i have just started a few days back. i am not able
> to mount my windows NTFS partitions on the SL partition. i am currently
> using SL 5.1. i will very much appreciate the help provided.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea wrote:
>>
>> I'm noticing weird behaviour from yum (3.2.8) in that 'yum repolist
>> disabled' lists *all* repositories as disabled (when in fact most of
>> them are enabled).
>>
>> Can you confirm this?
>>
>> TIA,
>> A
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Troy Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrea wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm noticing weird behaviour from yum (3.2.8) in that 'yum repolist
>>&g
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM, John Summerfield
wrote:
> I was thinking Troy was being a little prescriptive. I like the benzene
> idea. Science isn't just physics.
Please add biology as well :-D
Akemi
biochemist @ Division of Biochemistry
The Scripps Research Institute
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> Keith wrote ...
>> driver works fine in 5.2 . The EEE also needed a patched
>> ethernet driver with 5.0, while the driver in 5.2 worked fine.
>
> I spoke too soon. After a reboot, the network went away - or else
> I was not paying attentio
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:31:45AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> You might want to take a look at this CentOS wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b
>>
>> In th
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Craig Moore wrote:
> I hope this is the right forum for this. I'm having a major problem with
> Scientific Linux. I believe the problem may be due to scim_bridge im
> agent but I am not sure. It seems that if I try to run any GUI programs
> like: firefox, gedit, gth
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Simon Clubley
wrote:
> I've tried to install SL5.2 on a Acer Aspire One netbook (model
> AOA150-AB, internal 160GB hard disk) using a USB attached DVD drive,
> but I am experiencing a crash when the installation routine tries to
> load the usb_storage module.
> Be
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Simon Clubley
wrote:
> On 08/02/2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Have you seen this wiki?
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Acer/Aspire-One
>
> Thank you for the link; there's some very useful information there.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
> There are lots of reports of issues like this for tg3 but most reports end
> in "did not hear from requester so closing" or "Fedora Core X is not
> supported any more so closing". Does anyone know of a real solution to this
> problem. Reading
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ken Teh wrote:
> A simple question: I'd like to rebuild the current kernel rpm with minor
> mods to the config. The procedure I'm following is what's documented for
> RHEL 4, that is,
>
> install the src.rpm
> do an rpmbuild -bp
> cd to /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kern
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Ken Teh wrote:
> Excellent! Thank you very much Akemi. I was browsing through the spec file
> and encountered all those sections that you wrote up in the wiki. I did not
> wish to dig through all those details to figure out how to spec file works.
> Your recipe
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry to contradict you, but if someone does what you say, they will install
> "all* the kernels and *all* the kernel-modules.
> No, do *not* substitute "update" for "install", they mean two totally
> different things.
I think you meant
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Sorry to contradict you, but if someone does what you say, they will
>>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Robert E. Blair wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> You're quite right Troy. It's not as simple as what I put forth. I
> hadn't appreciated how many "kernel\*"s there were! My point was that
> using "update" leaves you with only the tes
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Robert E. Blair wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It could be - I presume this is the province of the
> /usr/lib/yum-plugins/kernel-module.py plugin? Troy must know what this
> does since I see his name in it. It looks more like a modu
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Robert E. Blair wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks.
> | installonlypkgs
> | List of packages that should only ever be
> installed, never
> | updated. Kernels in particular fall into this category.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> I guess I didn't specify this.
> This is for AMD processors only, specifically those with powernow.
> The cpuspeed *doesn't* have a kernel module, but the new 2.6.18-128 does
> have a new kernel module specifically called powernow-k8.
> This c
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Simon Clubley
wrote:
> As promised I am reporting back with my results of trying to use SL 5.2.
>
> First, here's a repost of the CentOS link (I make reference to it below):
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Acer/Aspire-One
>
> Summary: I have got SL 5.2 r
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Urs Beyerle wrote:
> Craig Moore wrote:
>> Pedro,
>>
>> For me I used the 'static' version, follow the instructions included
>> with the tar file.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the audio mixer in SL doesn't allow for Skype calls so I
>> just use it to send IMs. (If anyone h
2009/4/8 Urs Beyerle :
> Hi,
>
> I can just confirm that atheros wifi and WPA is broken on 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5
> kernel or later at least on one of my systems.
>
> The "problem" seems to be that Redhat has added ath5k.ko in
> 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5 kernel. ath5k.ko was not yet there in 2.6.18-128.el5 an
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Arthur Maciel wrote:
> Hi SciLinux, So I am happily using
>
> $cat /etc/redhat-release
> Scientific Linux Fermi LTS release 4.5 (Wilson)
>
> with one annoying "feature" -- at times, the fan goes full blast,
> the cpu slows down, and I do
>
> $top
> PID USER PR
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM, g wrote:
> greetings,
>
> in one of my system boxes, i have scientific linux 5.2, fedora 8 and 10,
> installed to ext3 fs, mandrake 2008 and '/home' installed to reiserfs.
>
> i access reiserfs from fc8, f10 and md2k8, and i need to access reiserfs
> from sl5.2.
>
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Urs Beyerle wrote:
> [...]
>>> modprobe reiserfs
>>
>> where is best to put this? in rc.local, rc.sysinit, or elsewhere?
>
> I guess you don't have to load the reiserfs module manually. The "mount"
> command will do it for you - either directly or over /etc/fstab.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:19 PM, g wrote:
> instead of running yum thru elrepo, i had pulled file and ran local install.
That is just fine.
> a check of logs shows mounting /dev/hdc1. nothing about reiserfsck.
>
> being that yumex does not show reiserfsck, as i had expected, what package
> woul
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:26 AM, g wrote:
> g wrote:
>
>>> You need to install the
>>> reiserfs-utils rpm which is available from the centosplus repository:
>>
>> pulled and on system.
>>
>> after sending this will install, take a break, and then reboot.
>
> longer break than had planned.
>
> ins
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM, g wrote:
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
> i do thank you again for all your help.
You are quite welcome. That kmod package was all Alan's effort. He
would be happy to learn that it worked for you.
Just one additional note. As I wrote earlier, the reiserfs mo
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:03 PM, g wrote:
>
> Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> That kmod package was all Alan's effort. He
>> would be happy to learn that it worked for you.
>
> email address? i will thank him personally.
Alan Bartlett ( ajb elrepo.org )
>> Just on
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>> Thanks Alan.
> > I followed the steps that you given previously to the thread. Now am able
> to
> > access network.
>
> > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19920&forum=41
> > - Not able to access my notwork - N
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Niels Walet
wrote:
> have a look at this link
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11086, it
> suggests it is doable, but indeed has some dependencies.
I did not quote this CentOS forum thread here because, as I (toracat)
stated there, it wa
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Tim Edwards wrote:
>>
>> We were hoping to evaluate KVM in the coming weeks. However as RHEL 5.4
>> is not yet out, and it'll be a few weeks after that the Scientific Linux
>> releases 5.4, does anyone know of any easy way to go about getting K
2009/7/2 Tomás de Barros Correia :
> Hello all,
>
> Does someone know if the vserver kernel is supported by scientific Linux?
> Some documentation, tutorial or something like it would be appreciate.
There is a CentOS Wiki article that will be useful to SL users as well:
http://wiki.centos.org/How
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Serguei Mokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>> This affects us. Imagine that all the CentOS users show up to use
>> Scientific Linux. Imagine all their maintainers and developers show
>> up, too.
>
> This is a good thing for SL,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Eugene Shin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some difficulties in installing a wireless adapter on my Toshiba
> laptop which is equipped with a Atheros AR5007eg . I don't know why, but I
> can't install the newest version of madwifi. Any instruction? I have
> installed SL
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I just downloaded Centos 5.3 Live-cd and find that I can't install it to the
> hard drive. I am accustomed to installing Fedora [10 this computer] from the
> Live-cd and adding to that as needed via yum.
>
> Will Scientific Linux 5.3 Live-cd ins
1 - 100 of 379 matches
Mail list logo
