Indeed a very interesting question, I will follow the answers.
I was and I am very happy with the work done in SL 6.x. So I'm sad
to see that there might be a change in direction.
Best regards
Andreas
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mai
Hi Pat,
thank you for the information.
Best regards
Andreas
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2015 15:03
> An: Andreas Mock; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
> Betreff: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-
Hi David,
Thank you for that. A valuable piece of information for the future.
Regards
Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: David Sommerseth [mailto:sl+us...@lists.topphemmelig.net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. September 2014 16:52
> An: Andreas Mock; Patrick J. L
ith stability in mind. So, up to now every update and upgrade
worked like a charm. Big thumb up for all who did this work.
Best regards
Andreas Mock
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. September 2014 13:33
gards
Andreas Mock
> Von: Patrick J. LoPresti [mailto:lopre...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 23:22
> An: Pat Riehecky
> Cc: Andreas Mock; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
> Betreff: Re: AW: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
>
> On Tue, S
Hi Pat,
thank you for the fast answer.
What does "TUV's sources" mean?
Was it the sources from git? Or were they taken directly
from RH?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
Von: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 21:53
An: Andreas Mock; SCIENTI
