On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Steven Haigh wrote:
RedHat seems to have something on this - but its locked behind the
subscription:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/29845
If its only the overnight cron you get it from, it may be good enough to
modify /etc/sysconfig/yum-autoupdate and add "yum
t; Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> Current : Fri Mar 25 07:54:39 2016
> Downloaded: Fri Mar 25 07:54:20 2016
So I haven't really been following this thread - however, once I read it
I note that I get this problem at least once an hour from at l
So, I need to qualify swapping chronyd for ntpd as a "resolution"...
The problem *mostly* went away. I'm still intermittently getting it, on a
smaller set of machines:
/etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current
>
> I confess that I have no real evidence on performance differences
> between NTPD and chronyd...
>
I do have some evidence.
chrony works better:
a) ntpd steps the time, some applications do not like that, chrony seems to
always adjust time smoothly
b) on some special purpose machines ntpd
On 11/03/16 19:25, Thomas Leavitt wrote:
I'm suspecting that the repomd.xml problem was a product of chronyd using a
different algorithm than ntpd, and the result of that being a minor divergence
in timestamps between server and client (seven seconds, as documented, on my
case). Flipping the
nal.gov] On Behalf Of Thomas
Leavitt
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 11:26 AM
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: RE: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] *RESOLVED* "Not using downloaded
repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:"
I'm suspecting that the repomd.xml problem was
Leavitt
-Original Message-
From: David Sommerseth [mailto:sl+us...@lists.topphemmelig.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 3:59 PM
To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Cc: Thomas Leavitt
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because
it is older
On 09/03/16 23:59, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 09/03/16 22:20, Thomas Leavitt wrote:
Hmm... looks like chronyd was installed by default under SL7 (learn
something new every day) rather than ntpd; systems seemed to still be synced
and accurate to the second. I swapped that out for ntpd. We'll see
-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because
it is older than what we have:"
On 03/09/2016 03:36 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, John Pilkington wrote:
>
>> But doesn't SL7 use chrony?
>
> We're
On 03/09/2016 03:36 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, John Pilkington wrote:
But doesn't SL7 use chrony?
We're talking servers (ie. always on systems) right? - where
supposedly ntpd is the better choice. I would think the mirrors are
running ntpd instead of chronyd.
But
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, John Pilkington wrote:
But doesn't SL7 use chrony?
We're talking servers (ie. always on systems) right? - where supposedly
ntpd is the better choice. I would think the mirrors are running ntpd
instead of chronyd.
But this discussion got me to rechecking again why ntpd
On 09/03/16 05:35, Antonio Querubin wrote:
A 7 second variance shouldn't be that much of an issue.
A time offset greater than a fraction of second suggests ntpd really
isn't time-synced.
Not sure if this is related but I've found that ntpd on SL7 systems dies
during bootup and require a
29, 2016 10:53 AM
To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we
have:"
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current : Tue Feb 16 08:58:20 2016
Downloaded: Tue Feb 16 08:58:13 2016
s...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:
>> owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Thomas
>> Leavitt
>> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:53 AM
>> To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
>> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older
>t
-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:
> owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Thomas
> Leavitt
> Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:53 AM
> To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
> Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than
> what we hav
-us...@fnal.gov
Subject: RE: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we
have:"
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current : Tue Feb 16 08:58:20 2016
Downloaded: Tue Feb 16 08:58:13 2016
A 7 second variance shouldn't be
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current : Tue Feb 16 08:58:20 2016
Downloaded: Tue Feb 16 08:58:13 2016
A 7 second variance shouldn't be that much of an issue.
Regards,
Thomas Leavitt
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Leavitt
Sent: Monday
-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of David
Sommerseth
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:51 AM
To: Peter Boy; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: "Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we
have:"
On 13/02/16 19:24, Peter Boy w
On 13/02/16 19:24, Peter Boy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since several months I get constantly from anacreon:
>> ——<
> /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
>
> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> Current : Thu Feb 4 16:13:26 20
ly from anacreon:
> ——<
/etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current : Thu Feb 4 16:13:26 2016
Downloaded: Thu Feb 4 16:13:25 2016
> ——<
The time difference is quite minimal. And a manual „yum update“ confirms that
no
Boy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since several months I get constantly from anacreon:
> > ??<
> /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
>
> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
> Current : Thu Feb 4 16:13:26 201
Hi all,
since several months I get constantly from anacreon:
> ——<
/etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
Current : Thu Feb 4 16:13:26 2016
Downloaded: Thu Feb 4 16:13:25 2016
> ——<
The tim
Does 'yum clean all' fix the issue?
13.2.2016 8.24 ip. "Peter Boy" <p...@barkhof.uni-bremen.de> kirjoitti:
> Hi all,
>
> since several months I get constantly from anacreon:
> > ——<
> /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:
>
> Not using downloaded
23 matches
Mail list logo
