Andreas Mock
Von: Patrick J. LoPresti [mailto:lopre...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 23:22
An: Pat Riehecky
Cc: Andreas Mock; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Betreff: Re: AW: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Pat Riehecky
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti lopre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
The sources were taken from git. They were then compared to the sources
from the public Release Candidate provided by upstream on April 22 2014.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Andreas Mock andreas.m...@drumedar.de wrote:
Hi Pat, hi Patrick,
thanks for your answers and comments.
How would someone like me get a SRPM for a binary package found or installed
on
a SL 7.0 system?
I really don't understand in the moment how it is
; Pat Riehecky; SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-
us...@listserv.fnal.gov
Betreff: Re: AW: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Andreas Mock
andreas.m...@drumedar.de wrote:
Hi Pat, hi Patrick,
thanks for your answers and comments.
How would someone like me
: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Andreas Mock
andreas.m...@drumedar.de wrote:
Hi Pat, hi Patrick,
thanks for your answers and comments.
How would someone like me get a SRPM for a binary package found or
installed on a SL 7.0 system
: AW: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Questions about SL 7.0
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
The sources were taken from git. They were then compared to the
sources from the public Release Candidate provided by upstream on
April
22 2014.
There were very
Hi Pat,
thank you for the fast answer.
What does TUV's sources mean?
Was it the sources from git? Or were they taken directly
from RH?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
Von: Pat Riehecky [mailto:riehe...@fnal.gov]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 21:53
An: Andreas Mock;
I'll see if I can provide some clarity, rather than muddy things here.
Short answer: basically from git
Long answer:
The sources were taken from git. They were then compared to the sources
from the public Release Candidate provided by upstream on April 22
2014. There were very few changes
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
The sources were taken from git. They were then compared to the sources
from the public Release Candidate provided by upstream on April 22 2014.
There were very few changes from this Release Candidate to the official
