Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-10-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
ing on one host. The underdocumented key >> was (drum roll please)... >> >> Enable IPv6, even though it's not in use. >> >> With bond0 set up for the two physical ports, a set of VLAN enabled >> ports called bond.vlan1, bond.vlan2, etc., and those and those VLAN >> enabled ports hooked to bridges called br1, br2, etc. I'm up and >> running. >> >> Now, if I could just get the *other* host working

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-10-10 Thread Paul Robert Marino
rdocumented key > was (drum roll please)... > > Enable IPv6, even though it's not in use. > > With bond0 set up for the two physical ports, a set of VLAN enabled > ports called bond.vlan1, bond.vlan2, etc., and those and those VLAN > enabled ports hooked to

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-10-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
s called bond.vlan1, bond.vlan2, etc., and those and those VLAN enabled ports hooked to bridges called br1, br2, etc. I'm up and running. Now, if I could just get the *other* host working

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-26 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> I've got an SL 6 setup to deal with which I inherited, with hosts that >> only have two NIC's, need to be on three VLAN's, and need to run KVM >> virtual servers. 9Actually, they may wi

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-26 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > I've got an SL 6 setup to deal with which I inherited, with hosts that > only have two NIC's, need to be on three VLAN's, and need to run KVM > virtual servers. 9Actually, they may wind up as our favorite upstream > vendor's distributio

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-26 Thread Andrew Pickford
Hi Nico, On 25/09/2012 20:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Don't focus on the boonding its transparent once configured. Treat the bonded interface bondx like it was a ethx and the guides will make sense. I beleave off the top of my head th

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-25 Thread Vladimir Mosgalin
Hi Nico Kadel-Garcia! On 2012.09.25 at 15:23:41 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote next: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Paul Robert Marino > wrote: > > Don't focus on the boonding its transparent once configured. > > Treat the bonded interface bondx like it was a ethx and the guides will make

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: > Don't focus on the boonding its transparent once configured. > Treat the bonded interface bondx like it was a ethx and the guides will make > sense. > I beleave off the top of my head the answer is apply the bridge to the vlan > interfac

Re: Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-24 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Don't focus on the boonding its transparent once configured. Treat the bonded interface bondx like it was a ethx and the guides will make sense. I beleave off the top of my head the answer is apply the bridge to the vlan interface unless you want the vlan tags to go to the vms and do 802.1Q on the

Using all 3 of pair bonding, tagged VLAN's, and KVM compatible bridges?

2012-09-24 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
I've got an SL 6 setup to deal with which I inherited, with hosts that only have two NIC's, need to be on three VLAN's, and need to run KVM virtual servers. 9Actually, they may wind up as our favorite upstream vendor's distribution, but I'm working with what I have now.) NetworkManager, of course,

Re: Bridges

2011-04-11 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 04/10/2011 12:42 PM, Joel Maslak wrote: For what it's worth, I just looked on one of my KVM hosts at the configs. ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0 TYPE=Ethernet Hi Joel, What is a "DEVICE=bond0"? Are you bonding multiple Ethernet adapters together? -T

Re: Bridges

2011-04-11 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 04/10/2011 06:37 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: You're missing over 20 years of pain and paranoia (which describes my IT career). It's not wildly unreasonable for a one-off. I've had to deal with lots of cluttered rc.local's, and unweave them, to stabilize systems. Deploying this kind of tweak t

[OT] Re: Bridges

2011-04-11 Thread Phil Schaffner
Federico Alves wrote on 04/10/2011 03:25 AM: Is there any way to make bridges retain their properties after a reboot, This is your second thread hijack within the original "Problems with VMware tools" thread, the first being "repositories". Using a "Reply"

Re: Bridges

2011-04-10 Thread Federico Alves
Thanks to all. It works fine with the word BRIDGE. But the discussion has been very useful. Federico On 4/10/11 3:42 PM, "Joel Maslak" wrote: >On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Tom H wrote: > >> And if you change "Bridge=br1" to "BRIDGE=br1"? > >+1. That will fix the issue. And doesn't require

Re: Bridges

2011-04-10 Thread Joel Maslak
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Tom H wrote: > And if you change "Bridge=br1" to "BRIDGE=br1"? +1. That will fix the issue. And doesn't require putting non-standard init scripts (or edits to rc.local) into place that could confuse an admin that knows how RedHat does things. For what it's wor

Re: Bridges

2011-04-10 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Todd And Margo Chester > wrote: >> >> I can see your point if you wanted to stop or restart things, or reverse >> them at shutdown, but if you only want to run them once, S99local >> (rc.local) is a good

Re: Bridges

2011-04-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: > Interesting.  Why would you want to stop or restart "Brctl addif br1 eth1"? For this very specific instance, you might not. The difficulty enters when you teach or encourage other people to pull this stunt with other settings, and

Re: Bridges

2011-04-10 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Federico Alves wrote: > > Is there any way to make bridges retain their properties after a reboot, > save for a script? > I have abridge that loses its physical interface when the machine reboots, > and as a result of that, all my virtual machines h

Re: Bridges

2011-04-09 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 04/09/2011 08:00 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: On 04/10/2011 12:25 AM, Federico Alves wrote: Brctl addif br1 eth1 Hi Federico, Back "in the day" before V

Re: Bridges

2011-04-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: > On 04/10/2011 12:25 AM, Federico Alves wrote: >> >> Brctl addif br1 eth1 >> > Hi Federico, > > Back "in the day" before Virtual Box took care > of the bridge itself,  I use to put this kind of stuff > into /etc/rc.d/rc.local. It is a

Re: Bridges

2011-04-09 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 04/10/2011 12:25 AM, Federico Alves wrote: Brctl addif br1 eth1 Hi Federico, Back "in the day" before Virtual Box took care of the bridge itself, I use to put this kind of stuff into /etc/rc.d/rc.local. It is a bash script that runs at the very end of your boot up. Just and idea. -T p.s.

Bridges

2011-04-09 Thread Federico Alves
Is there any way to make bridges retain their properties after a reboot, save for a script? I have abridge that loses its physical interface when the machine reboots, and as a result of that, all my virtual machines have no internet access. Specifically, this command does not survive a reboot