On 05/30/2012 04:55 PM, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
And for continuity, I'll point out that there was a similar, lengthy
discussion on this topic in September 2011.
Here is the thread started by Tanmoy Chatterjee:
On 06/05/2012 12:42 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 05/30/2012 04:55 PM, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
And for continuity, I'll point out that there was a similar, lengthy
discussion on this topic in September 2011.
Here is the thread started by Tanmoy Chatterjee:
On 06/04/2012 10:14 AM, zxq9 wrote:
On 06/05/2012 12:42 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 05/30/2012 04:55 PM, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
And for continuity, I'll point out that there was a similar, lengthy
discussion on this topic in September 2011.
Here is the thread started by Tanmoy Chatterjee:
On 4 June 2012 21:10, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
Back to my question: is there such a matrix? Has anyone -- paid
professional or volunteer -- prepared such a matrix? Or must one dig
through numerous listserve threads to garner the information, essentially
anew for each person
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
Back to my question: is there such a matrix? Has anyone -- paid
professional or volunteer -- prepared such a matrix?
http://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/yum.apt.repo
[ It's pretty funny to see apt is in the
On 06/04/2012 04:19 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Yasha Karantykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
Back to my question: is there such a matrix? Has anyone -- paid
professional or volunteer -- prepared such a matrix?
http://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/yum.apt.repo
[
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Connie Sieh cs...@fnal.gov wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
I have a question regarding the various RPM repos for the SL6.
Some of the repos have a major.minor version number:
